My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02520
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02520
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:16:45 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:16:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/20/2000
Description
ISF Section - New Appropriations Work Plan
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.. ~-, <br /> <br />Proposed Priority Criteria and Numeric Ratin!! Value <br /> <br />... t ""- <br /> <br />The following table identifies most if not all of the criteria that were discussed at the instream <br />flow workshop, Staff has assigned a numeric rating value for each of the proposed criteria based <br />upon the priorities discussed at the ISF Workshop, . <br /> <br />Instream Flow Priority Criteria Table <br /> <br />Priority Criteria Rating Value <br />Segments or Lakes with Endangered or Threatened Species 5 <br />Segments or Lakes with High Community Interest 5 <br />Segments or Lakes in State Parks 5 <br />Segments or Lakes affected by Donated Water Rights 4 <br />Segments or Lakes with Species of Special Concern 4 <br />, Segments or Lakes with Native Species 3 <br />Segments or Lakes wi Special Designation (Gold Medal/Wild Trout) 3 <br />Segments or Lakes on Public Lands with a High Recreation Value 3 <br />Segments or Lakes on Public Lands 2 <br />Segments or Lakes with an Interested Party Request , 2 <br />Segments or Lakes with Unique Ecological Significance 2 <br />Segments or Lakes where public funds are invested to provide access I <br />Segments or Lakes with High Future Developmental Potential I <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ISF Appropriation Year 2001 Work Plan Priorities <br /> <br />Using the above criteria, staff determined which streams or stream segments would be <br />.considered the highest priority for data collection and possible appropriations in 200 I, Based on <br />all of the information currently available to the staff, the following is a priority list of the streams <br />and stream segments for data collection and future appropriation: <br /> <br />Prioritv # I = San Miguel River - (Fall Creek - Dolores River) <br />Upper Terminus = Fall Creek Lower Terminus = Leopard Creek <br />Upper Terminus = Leopard Creek Lower Terminus'" Specie Creek <br />Upper Terminus = Specie Creek Lower Terminus = Saltado Creek <br />Upper Terminus = Saltado Creek Lower Terminus = Beaver Creek <br />Upper Terminus = Beaver Creek Lower Terminus = Horsefly Creek <br />Upper Terminus = Horsefly Creek Lower Terminus = CC Ditch <br /> <br />Flood Control and Floodplain Management. Larry Lang, Chief. Water Project Planning and Construction- Mike Serlet, Chief. <br />Instream Flows and Water Rights Investigations-Dan Merriman, Chief. Interstate Streams Investigations-Randy Seaholm, Chief. <br />Office of Conservation Planning-William Stanton, Chief. Personnel and Budget .Susan Maul, Chief <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.