My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02501
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02501
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:16:31 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:16:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/20/2000
Description
ISF Section - 2001 New Appropriation Recommendations and Instream Flow Work Plan
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Proposed Priority Criteria and Numeric Ratinl! Value <br /> <br />The following table identifies most if not all of the criteria that were discussed at the instream <br />flow workshop. Staff has assigned a numeric rating value for each of the proposed criteria based <br />upon the priorities discussed at the ISF Workshop, " <br /> <br />Instream Flow Priority Criteria Table <br /> <br /> Priority Criteria Ratinl! Value <br />Sel!1Ilents or Lakes with Endangered or Threatened Species 5 <br /> Segments or Lakes with High Community Interest 5 <br /> Segments or Lakes in State Parks 5 <br /> Sel!1Ilents or Lakes affected bv Donated Water Rights 4 <br /> Sel!1Ilents or Lakes with Species of Special Concern 4 <br /> Sel!IIlents or Lakes with Native Species 3 <br />Segments or Lakes wi Special Designation (Gold Medal/Wild Trout) 3 <br /> Sel!IIlents or Lakes on Public Lands with a High Recreation Value 3 <br /> SeGments or Lakes on Public Lands 2 <br />..-.. ........... u <br />I ~e(!ments or Lakes with an Interested Party Request 2 <br />------- <br /> SeGments or Lakes with Unique Ecolol'ical Sif!I1ificance 2 <br />Sel!1Ilents or Lakes where public funds are invested to provide access I I <br />Segments or Lakes with High Future Developmental Potential I <br /> <br />ISF Appropriation Year 2001 Work Plan Priorities <br /> <br />Using the above criteria, staff determined which streams or stream segments would be <br />considered the highest priority for data collection and possible appropriations in 200 I. Based on <br />all of the information currently available to the staff, the following is a priority list of the streams <br />and stream segments for data collection and future appropriation: <br /> <br />?rioritv # I = San Mi\!Uel River - (F211 Creek - Dolores River) <br />Upper Terminus = Fall Creek Lower Terminus = Leopard Creek <br />Upper Terminus = Leopard Creek Lower Terminus = Specie Creek <br />Upper Terminus = Specie Creek Lower Terminus = Saltado Creek <br />Upper Terminus = Saltado Creek Lower Terminus = Beaver Creek <br />Upper Terminus = Beaver Creek Lower Terminus = Horsefly Creek <br />Upper Terminus = Horsefly Creek Lower Terminus = CC Ditch <br /> <br />Flood Control and Floodplain Management -Larry Lang, Chief.. Water Project Planning and Construction- Mike Serler, Chief .. <br />Instream Flows and Water Rights Investigations;Dan Merriman, Chief.. Interstate Streams Investigations-Randy Seaholm, Chief.. <br />Office of Conservation Planning- William Stanton, Chief.. Personnel and Budget -Susan Maul. Chief <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.