My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02497
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02497
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:16:30 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:16:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/14/1971
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />IL~""Z' <br /> <br />When we said there were no other practical <br />methods, we meant that because our authority is <br />limited to flood control. We cannot investigate <br />the possibility of purchasing the South Platte <br />valley.. We .could eliminate floods.i:l.long in the <br />entire South Platte by purchasing eVerything <br />through Denver. But from a feasible standpoint <br />and from the viewpoint of our authQrity this is <br />not possible. This is what I meant when I said <br />that there is no other practical ~lternative to <br />flood control." <br /> <br />MR. BORGER: <br /> <br />"Mr. Sparks, could I ask you this then? In <br />that it is not within your authority to buy the <br />land adjacent to the flood channel, but it is <br />within your authority to spend money for channel <br />rights-of-way, flood control activities, then wa <br />ask that you join with us in eJ{ploring this <br />alternative. Perhaps ask that the board author- <br />ize Mr. Sparks, to seriously explo~e this alter- <br />native and come back with an answar to this board <br />no later than January 1, 1972." <br /> <br />1m. SPARKS: <br /> <br />"This alternative was explored to some ex-tent, <br />but on a limited basis at the very outset. Now <br />the Corps is doing a detailed analysis. The <br />possibility that you have mentioned is being <br />explored. I see nothing wrong with it. I think <br />we can still meet our time schedule and come up <br />with the answers. We will never be able to satis- <br />fy everyone, and as far as this board is concerned, <br />we are in favor of park areas. I want to make <br />that point clear." <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />"Senator Shoemaker had a question." <br /> <br />SENATOR SHOEMAKER: "Do you feel, Felix, that your. authority <br />includes flood plain zoning as well as acquiring <br />lands for channelization?" <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: "Senator, we have no direct authority for <br />flood plain zoning. We have already designated <br />this area as a flood plain under the authority <br />that we have. We have taken the official action <br />to say 'this is a flood hazard area.' The actual <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.