Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The general purpose of the meeting was to begin the discussion on "shortage criteria" that <br />the Secretary of Interior wanted developed pursuant to the recent Federal Register notice. <br />After some initial discussions all 7 -states agreed that there were two main goals and <br />objectives that the criteria had to achieve. <br /> <br />. Eliminate or greatly reduce the probability that curtailment of uses in the Upper <br />Basin would occur. <br />. Avoid the potential occurrence of shortages in the Lower Basin as long as <br />possible. <br /> <br />The Upper Basin States then presented a preliminary draft of the conceptual operations at <br />Lake Powell that was developed during the recent Upper Colorado River Commission <br />meeting in Farmington. Emphasis was placed on the fact that this was only half of a <br />potential solution and represented only Lake Powell operations during an extended <br />drought; the Lower Basin must add their piece. The proposal was considered worth <br />further study.pursing further. This proposed plan of operation must be fully evaluated. It <br />was noted that the Upper Basin already experiences shortages during drought conditions <br />simply due to natural hydrology and some consideration of this fact needs to be included. <br />It was noted that the states have approximately 2-months to close on the concept before <br />Reclamation intends to initiate the NEPA process to meet the Secretary's 30-month <br />schedule for the development of "shortage criteria." <br /> <br />2006 Annual Operating Plan Development: The Basin States and Reclamation <br />recently held a meeting in Las Vegas to initiate development of the 2006 op. Based upon <br />current and projected hydrologic conditions within the river basin, Reclamation <br />anticipates that 2006 will result in a "normal" declaration regarding the releases from <br />Hoover Dam. Additionally, Reclamation and the Basin States are discussing potential <br />language that could be included in the 2006 AOP associated with a mid-year review of <br />the releases from Glen Canyon Dam. <br /> <br />Revised Schedule of Calendar Year 2006 Mexican Water Deliveries: On May 2, <br />Mexico requested a modification of the 2006 monthly schedule of water deliveries <br />pursuant to the 1944 Water Treaty. Mexico has requ4sted a decrease in the amount of <br />water delivered in Jun4 2005, and an increase in the amount delivered in December 2005. <br /> <br />Proposed Solution to the Yuma Desalting Plant/Cienega de Santa Clara <br />Controversy: The Yuma Desalting Plant Issues Workgroup developed several short and <br />long-term recommendations, including: 1) utilization of Yuma area excess groundwater <br />to meet Mexican Treaty obligations; 2) creating a "shortage alleviation contingency <br />fund" to mitigate water supply disruption impacts; 3) implementing a basin-wide <br />consumptive use and forebearance program, based on voluntary and temporary land <br />fallowing 4) to fund and take necessary actions to operate the Yuma Desalting Plant <br />(YDP); 5) Implement a monitoring and research program at the Cienega de Santa Clara; <br />6) implement a program to reduce the over-delivery to Mexico related to changes in <br />water orders, resulting in better management of releases from upstream facilities; and 7) <br /> <br />28 <br />