My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02463
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02463
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:15:41 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:15:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/22/2005
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Stream and Lake Protection Program <br />Summary of Resolved Cases <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />The Board's ISF Rule 8i. states that: <br /> <br />"In the event the pretrial resolution includes terms and conditions preventing injury or interference and <br />does not involve a modification, or acceptance of injury or interference with mitigation, the Board is not <br />required to review and ratify the pretrial resolution. Staff may authorize its counsel to sign any court <br />documents necessary to finalize this type of pretrial resolution without Board ratification. <br /> <br />Staff has resolved issues of potential injury in the following water court case and authorized the <br />Attorney General's Office to enter into stipulations that protect the CWCB's water rights: <br />(1) Case No. 5-02CW354; William and Gail Braun <br />The Board ratified this statement of opposition at its March 2003 meeting. The Board's main objective in <br />filing the statement of opposition in this case was to ensure that the Applicants would replace injurious <br />depletions in time, place, and amount under their proposed plan for augmentation. The Staff, in cooperation <br />with the Attorney General's Office, has negotiated a settlement to ensure that the CWCB's instream flow <br />water rights will not be injured. <br /> <br />The Board holds the folIowing instream flow rights that could have been injured by these applications: <br /> <br />Case No. Stream Amount (cfs) Appropriation Date <br /> <br />5-76W2938 Woody Creek 6 01/14/76 <br />5-85CW646 Roaring Fork River 55/30 11/08/85 <br />5-85CW639 Roaring Fork River 145/75 11/08/85 <br /> <br />Applicants seek two absolute surface water rights on Little Woody Creek and Woody Creek as well as <br />four absolute storage rights for piscatorial and aesthetic uses. Applicants have contracted with the Basalt <br />Water Conservancy District to replace stream depletions associated with evaporative losses from the ponds. <br />All sources of augmentation provided by the Basalt Water Conservancy District (which include Green <br />Mountain and Ruedi Reservoirs) are located downstream of the ponds and the diversion points. The CWCB <br />and the Applicants have agreed to the entry of a decree that will prevent injury to the Board's ISF water <br />rights on Woody Creek and the Roaring Fork River. The Applicants have agreed to the folIowing terms <br />and conditions: <br /> <br />. The Applicants acknowledge the Braun Pond Ditch, Barn Ditch, Upper Braun Pond, Lower Braun <br />Pond, Barn Pond, Lower Braun Beaver Pond, and Upper Braun Beaver Pond are all junior to the <br />CWCB's instream flow water rights on Woody Creek, as decreed in Case No. 5-76W2938, and <br />the Roaring Fork River, as decreed in Case Nos. 5-85CW646 and 5-85Cw639, and as such, the <br />Applicants will curtail diversions at those structures at times when the CWCB's instream flow <br />water rights on Woody Creek and the Roaring Fork River are not being satisfied, or the Applicants <br />will augment the depletions from these junior diversions, in time and amount, upstream from <br />where the depletions impact Woody Creek and the Roaring Fork River. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />(2) Case No. 5-03CW300; James Hunting <br />The Board ratified this statement of opposition at its March 2004 meeting. The Board's main objective in <br />filing a statement of opposition in this case was to ensure that the Applicant would replace injurious <br />depletions in time, place, and amount under his proposed plan for augmentation. The Staff, in cooperation . <br />with the Attorney General's Office, has negotiated a settlement that ensures that the CWCB's instream flow <br />water rights will not be injured. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.