My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02463
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02463
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:15:41 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:15:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/22/2005
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />· Highlands Ranch Reservoir No. 12 -- A new 220-acre reservoir in Douglas County that could hold <br />up to 1.36 billion gallons with a dam that is 100 feet high and 1,500 feet long. <br /> <br />Bear Creek Reservoir Evaporation Replacement: The State of Colorado at the time of construction of <br />Bear Creek Lake Reservoir by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers committed to maintain a permanent <br />pool at the reservoir. The CWCB has acquired water rights for the permanent pool that are relatively <br />junior and only in priority during spring runoff and other high flow events. Evaporative losses from the <br />permanent storage pool have been covered in previous years using substitute water supply plans involving <br />the use of the Colorado Department of Human Resources (HR) very senior Simonton Ditch water right. <br /> <br />HR has no existing use for the Simonton, but has not been willing to covey the Simonton Right to the <br />CWCB without, in our opinion, exorbitant compensation. <br /> <br />Recent changes in the law would now require the state to file for an augmentation plan to replace Bear <br />Creek Lake evaporation or have the reservoir operated for that purpose. <br /> <br />Staff will be working with State Parks, Division of Wildlife and the City of Lakewood to attempt to <br />resolve the evaporation replacement on a long-term basis. <br /> <br />South Platte Forum: The date of the next annual South Platte Forum has been set for Oct. 26 and 27. For <br />more information visit: htto://southolatteforum.org. <br /> <br />South Platte Well Users Face 'Absolute Crisis': This year will be "an absolute crisis" for irrigation well <br />owners according to Tom Cech the Executive Director of the Central Colorado Water Conservancy <br />District. About 1,400 wells in the district will get between zero and 50 percent of the water this year that <br />they were allowed to pump last year. The majority of those wells are along the South Platte River from <br />the Brighton-Hudson area north to Greeley then east to Fort Morgan. <br /> <br />The crisis is the result of a drought that followed 20 of the wettest years in modem history. That drought, <br />which started in 2000 -- combined with exploding growth, court rulings and state legislation -- has <br />resulted in well owners being required to replace the water they use in the summer back to the South <br />Platte River in the winter to meet the needs of water right holders senior to those well owners. <br /> <br />Central has filed a water replacement plan with the water court in Greeley. A hearing has been set for <br />May. <br /> <br />In addition, Central may be forced to provide more replacement water from recent findings of well use in <br />the Beebe Draw and Box Elder areas of central Weld, which run parallel to the South Platte. According to <br />Cech, Central is looking at replacement water that cost $3,000 an acre foot three or four years ago that <br />now costs $6,000 or upward of $10,000 an acre foot because of growth. <br /> <br />Chatfield Reservoir Reallocation Study: There is an informational Board memo in your notebook, but <br />other activities are as follows. Chatfield Antecedent Flood Study - Larry Lang went to Omaha, Nebraska <br />on Mar. 4 to meet with the Corps' hydrologist about the Chatfield antecedent flood study. <br /> <br />The purpose of the study is to review Colorado's extreme precipitation and large floods to reevaluate the <br />Corps input design parameters that require the antecedent flood must be 50 percent of the Probable <br />Maximum Flood. The Corps stated that the study findings will be completed July 31,2005. This <br />investigation is one assumption that may carve out 20,600 AF of water supply storage from the flood pool <br />and still not reduce the level of flood protection to downstream areas. <br /> <br />Cherry Creek Dam Safety Study: During Larry Lang's Mar. 4 meeting in Omaha, a formal request was <br />made to the Corps to use Colorado's Probable Maximum Precipitation study findings from the for <br />reevaluating the Probable Maximum Flood (pMF) needs at Cherry Creek Dam and Reservoir. The <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.