Laserfiche WebLink
<br />9 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Agenda Item 32 <br />March 22 - 23, 2005 Board Meeting <br />Page 3 of13 <br /> <br />Please note that power is listed as "incident to" the authorized purposes and fish and wildlife <br />enhancement and public recreation may benefit from CRSP operations consistent with the primary <br />purposes of said projects. <br /> <br />The 1968 Colorado River Basin Project Act (CRBP A) authorized other water projects in the basin, <br />including the Central Arizona Project. Authorized project purposes in the 1968 Act included fish <br />and wildlife enhancement and public recreation and there has been considerable debate about <br />whether the CRBP A amended the authorized purposes for projects built under the 1956 CRSP Act. <br />There is no language in the CRBP A that specifically mentions changing the purposes of the CRSP <br />units, and section 60l(a) ofthe CRBPA specifically states: <br /> <br />Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to alter, amend, repeal, modifY, or be in conflict with <br />the provisions of [the compacts, the 1944 treaty with Mexico, the decree in AZ v. CA,] or, <br />except as otherwise provided herein, [the Boulder Canyon Project Act, the Boulder Canyon <br />Project Adjustment Act,} or the Colorado River Storage Project Act ... <br /> <br />A strict interpretation of the Acts would allow releases to benefit fish, wildlife and recreation only <br />to the extent that those releases meet an authorized purpose of the Aspinall Unit. The USBR is <br />currently consulting with its attorneys on this issue. Their decision will be reflected in the No <br />Action Alternative and throughout the EIS process. <br /> <br />2. InterPretation of CA5782 and releases for downstream users <br />There is a question about USBR's obligation under one of the decrees for the Aspinall Unit that <br />was conveyed to them by the CR WCD, specifically language in Civil Action 5782 to release <br />storage water (beyond their obligation to bypass inflow) if needed for downstream senior water <br />rights. <br /> <br />Mike Gross, consultant representing RedIands Water and Power, Uncompahgre Valley Water <br />Users Association and TriCounty Water Conservancy District, cites language in CA5782 as <br />follows: <br /> <br />Crystal releases "insofar as available, be in such quantity as will satisfY at all times prior <br />decrees from said Gunnison River below the Crystal Dam when commingled with the <br />natural accretions in the channel of said river. " <br /> <br />The CRWCD states Reclamation should make such storage releases unless Blue Mesa storage falls <br />below minimum power generating elevation: <br /> <br />"In the Districts' view, the term insofar as available means that Reclamation is obligated to <br />make releases from the Unit to satisfY downstream seniors, unless the water sutface <br />elevation at Blue Mesa is below the minimum necessary to operate the Blue Mesa <br />power plant. " <br /> <br />The USBR has NOT been operating Aspinall in strict accordance with this interpretation and this <br />has been a non-issue except during extreme droughts like 1977 and 2002. The USBR interprets <br />this as an obligation to release water in a manner that does not increase the amount or timing of <br />administrative calls to upstream junior rights.. <br />Flood Protection. Water Project Planning and Finance. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Sup.ply Protection. Conservation Planning <br />