Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ouo <br /> <br />work in the Chief Engineer's Office and the subsequent <br />preparation of the report. As mentioned previously, it <br />is estimated that the report could then be completed in <br />January or February 1959 rather than in June 1959. <br /> <br />Very truly yours, <br /> <br />/s/ E. O. LARSON <br />Regional Director <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. LARSON: <br /> <br />"We discussed this with the Chief <br />Engineer this morning and this is how <br />we see the picture right now and what <br />we can do. Perhaps Mr. Riter has some- <br />thing to add." . <br /> <br />Mr. Riter explained the chart and briefly sum- <br />marized the possible feasibility of the three and two dam <br />sites. He also said that a tunnel was not feasible in ans- <br />wer to a question by Mr. Peterson. <br /> <br />MR. MOSES: <br />MR. ~HLLER: <br /> <br />"Are there any questions?" <br /> <br />"Can we secure data concerning the <br />total storage capacity of these three <br />alternate routes?4 <br /> <br />MR. RITER: <br />MR. BARNARD: <br /> <br />4Yes, we will send those to you.4 <br /> <br />rilR. LARSON: <br /> <br />"Would this six months difference <br />in timing advance the feasibility re- <br />port to Congress?4 <br /> <br />"Yes, we could advance the date six <br />months but we could not say what Congress <br />wi 11 do." <br /> <br />MR. CRAWFORD: <br /> <br />"Even by advancing this date six <br />months, it would not get into the Presi- <br />dent's budget." <br /> <br />"Is $35,000 from the State all you <br />can spend to advance this date?" <br /> <br />GOV. McNICHOIB: <br /> <br />MR. LARSON: <br /> <br />"Yes, that is about all the State's <br />funds we could use at this time." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Governor McNichols asked if a delay.might be <br />occasioned by other reasons than just the financial aid and <br />