Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />NATIONAL DROUGHT POLICY COMMISSION CONCLUSIONS a <br /> <br />The United States would benefit from development of national drought policy with preparedness as .. <br />its core. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Preparedness measures, particularly comprehensive drought planning and proactive mitigation <br />measures, can lessen the impact of drought on individuals, communities, and the environment. They <br />can also reduce the need for future emergency financial and other relief. Effective drought plans <br />should have clearly identified objectives and performance standards and a clear exposition of the <br />vulnerability of a region to drought, given current and expected water resources infrastructure and <br />water uses. They should be flexible to avoid a "one size fits all" approach and allow for social, <br />cultural, and religious differences. For both urban and rural communities, they should consider the <br />location of alternate or supplemental sources of water, how this water can be conveyed to the point <br />of need, and whether additional treatment is needed. They should also be based on cost and <br />performance. <br /> <br />Effective plans should evaluate drought programs to determine whether they identify and address <br />priority environmental impacts and improve proactive mitigation of drought's impacts on the <br />environment through training, incentives, technical assistance, research, and public education. <br />Effective plans should consider the allocation of water to meet the need to protect the environment <br />and to meet immediate human needs. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />The people and entities that are likely to receive the greatest share of federal emergency assistance <br />because of drought often have the fewest personnel, information, and financial resources to prepare <br />for and reduce the potential impacts of drought. e <br /> <br />Individuals, businesses, local/county/state governments, tribes, and non-governmental organizations <br />with an interest in or responsibilities for drought management would benefit from training and <br />technical assistance to plan for and reduce the impacts of drought. <br /> <br />There are a number of success stories in drought preparedness and proactive mitigation at the <br />individual, local, state, regional, and federal levels that would make excellent models for use in <br />training and technical assistance. Among those cited in this report are the nonprofit TreePeople's <br />"Second Nature" program in Los Angeles, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California's <br />"Integrated Resource" and "Water Surplus and Demand Management" plans, Kentucky's drought <br />management plan, the Georgia Water Management Campaign, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's <br />Drought Program, the Army Corps of Engineers' simulated drought exercises, and the small <br />watersheds assistance offered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture <br /> <br />Partnerships among nonfederal governments, the federal government: and private interests can go far <br />in developing the tools and strategies for formulating and carrying out appropriate drought <br />preparedness strategies. <br /> <br />Proactive mitigation activities such as water conservation, science-based forest management, reuse <br />of wastewater, desalination, pricing strategies, and the identification of back-up water supplies- <br />when initiated before an emergency---can reduce vulnerability to drought events. <br /> <br />In some parts of the country, there is insufficient area coverage or recorded history for stream gage <br />and climate data. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />- <br />