My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02394
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02394
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:15:07 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:14:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/15/2005
Description
ISF Section - Horsefly Creek - Motion to Intervene and Notice to Contest
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Discussion <br />Staff and the parties have spent a significant amount of time working together to reach a <br />mutually acceptable approach to the Horsefly Creek instream flow water right. The issues . <br />identified in Pacific/Desert's Motion to Intervene and Notice to Contest are similar to the issues <br />raised by the Eldred Colorado Family Partnership, Assistant Attorney General Ginny Brannon <br />has discussed these issues with counsel for Pacific/Desert and informed her of staffs willingness <br />to work with Pacific/Desert on acknowledging its existing water rights under section 37-92- <br />102(3)(b) in the Board's water right application and decree prior to filing the application. In its <br />Notice to Contest, Pacific/Desert states that it "anticipates that its concerns can be adequately <br />addressed with the imposition of terms and conditions on enforcement of the ISF, and <br />Pacific/Desert welcomes the opportunity to confer with CWCB staff about Pacific/Desert's <br />concerns. " <br /> <br />Staff is confident of its ability to work cooperatively with Pacific/Desert to develop mutually <br />acceptable terms and conditions for the Horsefly Creek instream flow water right decree, Staff is <br />firmly committed to working with Pacific/Desert to that end prior to filing the water rights <br />application in December, If for some reason staff and Pacific/Desert cannot reach mutually <br />acceptable terms by December 31, staffreconnnends filing the water court application to obtain <br />the 2005 adjudication date that staff and the parties have worked so hard to make possible, Staff <br />then will continue to negotiate a resolution with Pacific/Desert in the context of the water court <br />proceeding. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staffreconnnends that the Board (1) deny Pacific/Desert's request to intervene; (2) direct staffto <br />work with Pacific/Desert to address its concerns and develop mutually acceptable terms and . <br />conditions to include in the Horsefly Creek instream flow decree; and (3) take final action on the <br />Horsefly Creek instream flow appropriation as will be requested in Agenda Item 18b and file a <br />water court application on or before December 31, 2005. <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.