My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02384
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02384
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:15:01 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:14:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/24/2006
Description
WSP Section - Presentation by Tim Carlson of the Tamarisk Coalition
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />TaJlldfislC.OIl <br />CWCB PrcsclIt.ttioJl, 1-25-2006 <br /> <br />SUlluual'Y <br />Tamarb.:k InvcntOl'Y fOl' the Colorado, <br />Arkansas, and Purgatoire Ri\'ers <br /> <br />Hackgl"ounu -11w Tamarisk Coalition received a Sso,ooo grant from the Colorado \Vater Conservation Board to <br />perform an inventory of tamllrisk infestations on the Colorado and Arkansas Rivers within the state. This report <br />sumlllJri:t.es the findings from this effort. The purpose of this work was to estahlish and implement an inventory protocol <br />th;H is economical to perform and would pro\~de a clear understanding of the extent of the tamarisk problem. The <br />Colorado River and Arkans<.ls River watersheds are identified bec;Juse they are heavily infested and represent two distinct <br />topogrJphic conditions - J western slope canyon setting that is predominantly Federal lands and a front range prairie <br />.setting that is predominantly private agricultural lands. A survey of the Purgatoire River in southeastern Colorado was <br />completed with local funding and this information is included within this summary report. The "lampa River and its <br />tribulJncs, and the headwaters of the Dolores to McPhee Reservoir were also surveyed; however, this information is <br />currC'ntly being analyzed and is not yet available. <br /> <br />Inventory - IIwentoI}' and mapping were performed during the summer and fall of 2005 and coordinated with the U.S. <br />Geological Survey's (USGS) efforts at establishing a national on-line database which would conform to the weed mapping <br />."tandards developed by the North AmeIican Weed Management Association. The basic approach was to use existing <br />aerial photography and satellite image!)' and local knowledge available from counties, river districts, soil and water <br />conservation districts, state agencies, Army Corps of Engineers, National Resources Conservation Service, USGS, CSU, <br />and The Nature Conservancy. This information was then "ground-tmthed" by a 2-man team to confinn infestation <br />density, maturity, terrain, presence of native species, and several other site characteristics. GPS data and digital photo <br />records \\'crc taken and shape tiles were developed utilizing GIS capabilities at Mesa State College. Over 800 miles on the <br />Color<lJo, Arkansas, and Purgatoire rivers and their major tributaries were surveyed using this approach. This <br />information, in the fonn of shape files and characteristics data, has been transfonned into a digital GIS database which <br />soon will be aVJilable on the USGS invasive species website, ww\v.niiss.org. <br /> <br />Finding - The inventory summJI)' for the three river systems is presented in Tables 1 and 2. TributalY infoJ1l1ation is <br />presented in T<Jbles 3 and 4. Tables 1 and 3 present the general mapping data; whereas, Tables 2 and 4 provide <br />information on estimated current water and future water losses associated with the tamarisk infestations and the <br />estimated costs for tamarisk control and revegetation. These water losses and cost estimates are based on the most recent <br />research and statistical analysis available through the USDA, NOAA, USGS, CSU, National Invasive Species Council, <br />T;:lInarisk Coalition, and others. The following represents our findings: <br /> <br />I. The Arkansas River is the most heavily infested \\-1.th 29,280 tot]l acres, has the highest average density of 57%, and <br />the greatest average width at 1,226 feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.