|
<br />
<br />PiIiaJjciltl'D'3ta,G$OOO):
<br />
<br />Am,'.', atjzed !.finartcial Data:
<br />~k-
<br />PJ>E.
<br />1/<&18'
<br />Canst
<br />Total
<br />
<br />Totals Non-Fed (35%) Fed{6S%)
<br />545 (!) , 54~
<br />~O (!) ~O
<br />5,7'15 2,355 3;360
<br />6,730 2;355 If,ns
<br />
<br />'F~G'~r>tfFl1l1.~iug Ne'ecl~($l,ID(!)l))
<br />FY,OI FY0i2$Y03,
<br />S); 4(iJ(iJ60
<br />
<br />F~(!)i:f
<br />
<br />Bal
<br />
<br />gS,
<br />
<br />4@j')
<br />
<br />,~~
<br />1~,
<br />'$Ii),
<br />
<br />3,26(!)
<br />3;26(!)
<br />
<br />'60. ,
<br />
<br />Notes:
<br />,l.P1aJ1$ &,Speciticatio!ls&conslroctionestimates:derivecl 'frotnsiinilanecenfe'ffol'l~hy'tb."
<br />Dismct'&artd: (jt1ier,agencie~,t1iat ha.ve recently beeU.,unclel'lilken oreMs'li'uctecl:WitJim.llisiritllhotmdanes.
<br />2.DPR &; P&Slltitially feclerall)i'fmancecl, uon-fecleralshare of!hese'eosts'rec,(j'Veteddyrin,g CQj]Sjroctlon,
<br />3. Non"Fed,art;J.onntind'Ucl,,~35% share ofIlPR &:P&SreiriJbl1r~e.mel1.t
<br />Non_Federl1r,Rei:l.!lltemelits .($'(!)(!)O):
<br />
<br />LBR:RI)'s
<br />CaSh
<br />WilrkcincKfud
<br />Annua1,Q&M
<br />Notes:
<br />1.LER;R1J,scons'istdf 34 private ownersmpsaveraging 143acre~ each;' g% of estimatecltotalproject co~t.
<br />2.0&Mcosts,estimatedhasecl onpreviollS experience witnsitnU,ar projects.
<br />TotalProject Fil.'stCost(1';(!)'(!)(!)): '6ilrZ(!).
<br />Mra1 Alloca,tiOliS, to date (1,(!)(J(!)):
<br />. PlU' li.t;OC1@
<br />DPR 485iOOff'
<br />P&8 0
<br />CQlrswction (!)
<br />
<br />5S0
<br />1.7'l(!)
<br />(!)
<br />25
<br />
<br />Benefits. Benefits associated with the 60 to 70 restored acres are in line with estimated proje,ctcQ'St'h:i!llgtential
<br />benefits generated by this project compare very favorably to otherinterrn0ooiain ecosysteI'nproJe{jtsqe.~ducted
<br />bytheUS. Army Corps ofEngineets. The ben\lfitsaredescriheainthePruj:e0tlfdPi:ojectOil'*Pllts~aJJa,graph
<br />above. Regional, state, and national eff0rts such ast1teN0rthAmerican W\ff\iltifowl J!,4ilUaagementP.JW,;Wi1l
<br />ben.efitfriilI'nJhi:s project. ' . . , ,
<br />
<br />As withall'ec0system restoration ptojeC!.s,post-c0nstrllctionmmmt'olU}'g ~upto on.e gereent of ptoj61ct cost) and
<br />adaptiverolUi!tS\llTI\lnt (upAothreepetcent of pr0jeqt cost)wiltb\lr"f'I,)iilltf~foranl!~eg:,a,ate'Plll1ioi:'1.~.ja'la1.\l to
<br />insure thatthefulIpoteritial bertefitsof the project are relilized. .~~rl's ofthemonitorin~an\!!Latl.~tive
<br />management in regard to, the specific nature, extent and,co'srs will be developed during the ])lP'RPh~S\l;) The
<br />non-Federal projectsponsoris also required to fund the annual opellation, m:aintenance, re'p'air, tlilplaQfelil:rent and
<br />rehabilitation (OMR&RR) costs once the project fs complete.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />-7-
<br />L:\SecUon Folders\SECA\Board Meetings\September 2002IAgenda item 19-Corps report attachemenl.doc
<br />01:22
<br />
<br />
<br />09/03/2002 PM
<br />
|