My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02377
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02377
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:14:56 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:14:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/13/1998
Description
WSP Section - Colorado River Basin Issues - 15-Mile Reach Recovery Water Rights - Cases No. 5-95CW296 and 5-95CW297
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />\\ Wat~~~~~~"gC'~"=" <br /> <br />RECEIVED <br />JUH 1 /) 1998 <br /> <br /> <br />eoColorado Water <br />nservation Boarc <br /> <br />June II, 1998 <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 721 <br />Denver, CO 80203-2279 <br /> <br />Attention: Mr. Peter Evans, Acting Director <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Future ofCWCB Actions Re: Case Nos, 9SCW296 and 297, Water Division 5 <br /> <br />Dear Peter: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In response to yourrequest and the request of W endy Weiss, I am submitting the following <br />comments regarding the two instream flow filings on behalf of the Upper Basin water users <br />participating in the Upper Colorado Recovery Program. <br /> <br />1. Neither the recovery flow nor base flow filing on the IS-mile reach of the Colorado River <br />should be withdrawn at this time, because the implications for the Section 7 Agreement are <br />unclear. These filings are still included in the Recovery Program Recovery Action Plan <br />(RIPRAP). The Recovery Program should be consulted before taking any action regarding <br />withdrawal of filings. <br /> <br />2. The base flow filing appears to provide some benefits to the endangered species, The Board <br />should move ahead with adjudicating this filing, <br /> <br />3, Action on the recovery flow filing should be put on hold until it is determined whether or not <br />an acceptable structure for the filing can be crafted and/or acceptable alternatives can be <br />found that would satisfY the commitments made under the Recovery Program regarding <br />protection of flows under state law, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4, There may be acceptable alternatives to the current recovery flow filing, including non-flow <br />alternatives, that will help recovery of endangered fish. Some of these alternatives are being <br />explored in the current discussions on the Colorado River Programmatic Biological Opinion, <br />and others may be available. <br /> <br />5, While the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has voiced concerns over the benefits of the filing <br />to endangered fish in their current form, the Service has stated that it is still committed to <br /> <br />535 North Garfield Avenue <br />Loveland. Colorado 80537.5548 <br /> <br />Phone: 970.667-8690 <br />FAX: 970.667.8692 <br /> <br />E-Mail: <br />h2orus@waterconsult.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.