Laserfiche WebLink
<br />STATE OF COLOMDO <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />..: <br /> <br /><. <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (0)) 666.3441 <br />FAX: 13031 866.4474 <br /> <br />Agenda Item 2ip <br /> <br />e< <br /> <br />March 4,1999 <br /> <br />Mr. Mark Wondzell <br />Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Monument <br />2465 South Townsend Avenue <br />Montrose, Colorado 81401 <br /> <br />Ref: Quantification of Reserved Water Right for the Black Canyon of the Gunnison <br />National Monument <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Wondzell, <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I am.writing on behalf of the Colorado Water Conservation Board to submit its comments <br />on the quantification proposal for Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Monument <br />(Monument) reserved water rights presented by the National Park Service (NPS) at public <br />meetings on December 15 and 16, 1998. I appreciate the chance to comment. The Board <br />is vitally concemed both with flows through the Black Canyon, where it has a decreed <br />instream flow right, and with the operation of the Aspinall Unit immediately upstream of <br />the Monument, which serves a number of purposes that benefit the State of Colorado. <br />The Board has participated in various efforts over the last ten years to accommodate the <br />needs of the NPS without impairing vital state and federal interests. <br /> <br />The Board appreciates and supports the NPS's efforts to settle its claims for the <br />Monument through negotiation rather than litigation. Negotiation offers a chance for a <br />solution that benefits all interests, while avoiding the risk, delay, and expense of <br />litigation. I do, however, wish to express concern and discomfort with the Park Service's <br />schedule for consideration of this proposal. Reserved water rights for the Monument <br />were judicially confirmed but not quantified in the U.S. v. Denver proceeding, <br />culminating in the Colorado Supreme Court's opinion in 1982. While the Bureau of <br />Reclamation (Reclamation) and the NPS have discussed a contract for Aspinall water to <br />satisfy the Monuments reserved water rights in the past, this is the first time the NPS has <br />come forward with any proposal to quantify its water rights. Nevertheless, at the public <br />meetings, representatives of the NPS seemed to expect that the numerous and complex <br />issues surrounding the quantification should be resolved in a matter of months. <br /> <br />Because there are so many complex issues to resolve, it is important that this process not <br />be rushed. In particular, Reclamation's consultation on the operations of the Aspinall <br />Unit with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under Section 7 of the Endangered <br />Species Act has yet to be .completed. The Service may recommend significant changes in <br />e Aspinall operations, and Aspinall unit operations affect water use and water availability <br /> <br />BiUQwens <br />Governor <br /> <br />Greg E. Walcher <br />Executive Director, ONR <br />Peter H. Evans. <br />Director, ewCB <br />