Laserfiche WebLink
<br />would be 5.50 percent. All other rates were then structured from the High-Income <br />category as follows: <br /> <br />The Standard, Municipal Low Income, and Agricultural lending rates were set <br />using essentially the same relative differences as in previous years, i.e.; Standard <br />is IO percent less than High Income while Low Income and Agricultural are 20 <br />percent less than Standard. Small discrepancies result from rounding. <br /> <br />The lending rate for the CommerciallIndustrial category was set at 120 percent of <br />the Standard Income rate. <br /> <br />The procedure outlined above results in the rate structure shown in Table I. <br /> <br />Table 1. Recommended 30-Year Lending Rates for 2000 <br /> <br /> <br />The municipal lending categories are defined as follows: <br /> <br />Municipal low-income areas are those communities where median household <br />income (MHI) is less than 80 percent of the statewide MHI. <br /> <br />Municipal high-income areas are those communities in which MHI is greater than <br />I 10 percent of the statewide MHI. <br /> <br />The municipal standard, or middle-income communities, are those in which MHI <br />falls between 80 and I 10 percent of the statewide MHI. <br /> <br />Table 2 summarizes the annual lending rate structures adopted by the Board since 1995. <br /> <br />Table 2. 30- Year Lending Rates, 1995 - 1999 <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />~, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />- <br /> <br />. <br />