My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02336
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02336
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:14:41 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:14:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/27/1999
Description
Directors' Reports
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />c~ <br /> <br />L <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />TMDL Final Rules: The EP A has released its anticipated proposed rules for Total Maximum <br />Daily Loads (TMDLs). Published in the Federal Register on August 23, the rules were signed by EP A <br />Administrator Carol Browner on August 12. They are the result of a TMDL committee's consensus <br />recommendations for more than 100 changes, that were submitted in a final report to EPA on July 28, <br />1998. <br /> <br />A TMDL is a computation of how much of a particular pollutant that a river or lake can assimilate <br />without violating its water quality standards. The Clean Water Act requires states to make lists of water <br />bodies for which minimum water quality controls on all municipal and industrial dischargers are not <br />enough to meet water quality standards (so-called 303(d) waters). States are required to do TMDLs for <br />those waters. IfEPA disapproves a state's TMDL or list of waters that need TMDLs, the EPA is required <br />to establish the TMDL for the state. EPA has approved over 200 TMDLs that Colorado has already <br />submitted. <br /> <br />Waters listed by the State pursuant to Section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act would be <br />organized into different categories, including: "waters impaired or threatened by pollutants or by unknown <br />causes; waters impaired or threatened by pollution; waters for which TMDLs have been completed, but <br />water quality standards have not yet been attained; and waters expected to meet water quality standards by <br />the next listing cycle as a result of the use of other enforceable pollution controls." TMDLs would only be <br />prepared for water bodies included in the first classification under the new rules. <br /> <br />States would have 15 years to establish all TMDLs. States would be required to prepare TMDLs <br />for high priority waters within five years of the waters being listed. A high priority will be given to listing <br />waters and pollutants causing impairment or threat to endangered/threatened species. <br /> <br />.. The proposed rules would also revise the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System <br />(NPDES) and Water Quality Standards regulations. The new rules would also give EPA the authority to <br />regulate certain Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) as point sources, and require them to <br />obtain NPDES permits. <br /> <br />The comment period on the proposed rules ends on October 22. Comments may be provided either <br />in hard copy or electronic form. For a copy of the proposed final rules, visit www.epa.gov/owow/tmdl/ <br />tmdlrule.html or the Federal Register website at www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/aces/acesI40.html. <br /> <br />EPA Signs Enforcement Agreement with Environmental Groups: On September I the EPA <br />announced it reached an settlement with Colorado environmental groups concerning a lawsuit filed <br />against the EPA regarding the Clean Water Act's Total Maximum Daily Load, or TMDL, program. <br />Under the settlement, the lawsuit will be suspended until 2006. The plaintiffs were the Colorado <br />Environmental Coalition and the Biodiversity Legal Foundation. Earth Justice Legal Defense Fund <br />represented them. <br /> <br />Colorado is a party to the settlement and has 10 years to finish setting TMDLs for all waters it <br />listed in 1998 as needing TMDLs. The TMDLs to be developed by Colorado under this agreement will <br />address pollutants that affect human health and the quality of fisheries in the State. If Colorado misses <br />interim TMDL deadlines, the EP A has two years to set them. EP A and Colorado also agreed to establish <br />a website with information about Colorado's TMDL program by January 1,2000. <br /> <br />USGS Budget Cuts: Congress is considering another reduction offundingfor the USGS's <br />cooperative water resources data collection efforts. The USGS Cooperative Program funds hundreds of <br />. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.