My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02335
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02335
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:14:40 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:14:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/24/2003
Description
Report of the Attorney General
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />KEN SALAZAR <br />Attorney General <br /> <br />CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO <br />Chief Deputy Attorney General <br /> <br />ALAN J. GILBERT <br />Solicitor General <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DEPARTMENT OF LAW <br /> <br />STATE SERVICES BUILIJING <br />1525 Sherman Street - 5th Floor <br />Denverr Colorado 80203 <br />Phone 303) 866-4500 <br />FAX 303) 866-5691 <br /> <br />OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL <br /> <br />March 25, 2003 <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> <br />FROM: Ken Salazar <br />Attorney General <br /> <br />Wendy Weiss ~ <br />First Assistant Attorney General <br /> <br />RE: Report of the Attorney Generall <br /> <br />1. Forest Service Reserved Rights Cases, Case Nos. 81-CW-220 et aI., Water Division 2. <br />\ . <br />I think we've reached agreement of! a stipulation allowing the Forest Service to withdraw the <br />Division 2 claims with prejudice, on sonditions acceptable to the objectors. We're now waiting <br />for the Forest Service to actually distribute the stipulation. <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />2. Forest Service Reserved Rights~ases, Case Nos. W-1146-73 et al., Water Division 7. <br /> <br />The fu\1 negotiating committee met on February 4th. The State and water users had <br />questions that the Forest Service wasn't prepared to answer, so we cut the meeting short. We've <br />received some additional information and will be drafting a counterproposal to give to the Forest <br />Service in April. Once the Forest Service has responded, we'\1 decide whether it's worthwhile to <br />continue the negotiations. The Board members may wish to discuss litigation and settlement <br />strategy on these cases with counsel in executive session. <br /> <br />3. Kansas v. Colorado, United States Supreme Court, No. 105, Original. <br /> <br />1 Text concerning previously reported matters will usually contain only information on recent developments rather <br />than repeating backgroW1d information. Material to which we wish to call special attention appears in bold italics, <br />and any entirely new matters are specifically identified as [NEWl. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.