My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02286
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02286
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:14:14 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:13:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/11/1998
Description
Colorado River Basin Issues - Endangered Species Issues - 15-Mile Reach Section 7 Consultation - Status Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. Colorado River Biological Opinion Discussion Group <br />May 1, 1998 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />~ CTI'and Valley Water Management Plan/Orchard Mesa <br /> <br />1. Grand VaUeywater Management project is Category 1 and Category 2 RPA. Need to <br />reconcile differences in proposals by water USers and USFWS, Need to sort out what is <br />Category 1 and Category 2 re: legal protection of water, <br /> <br />2. Delivery of surplus water from 66,000 acre-feet HUP Orchard Mesa Power Plant: <br />Clarification is needed on whether the Category 1 RP As are identical, <br /> <br />3. Start and completion dates needed for Grand Valley Water Management Project. <br /> <br />Recoverv Flow Filinf,'s <br /> <br />I, Recovery flow filings: Is this an RP A? If so, for which category? <br /> <br />2. Legal group needs to draft decree, <br /> <br />Voluntary Coordinated Mana~ement of west slope WIlter <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1. Voluntary coordinated management of west slope facilities: FWS needs to respond to <br />proposal by 5/4/98. Details need to be agreed upon, <br /> <br />2. Cooperation and implementation of Program from Recovery agreements: Resolve concerns <br />regarding "to the extent that such activities do not impair the yield." [Note: This should be <br />rolled into the discussion of "Voluntary coordinated management of west slope water <br />facilities," (2,A.8c)] <br /> <br />Recoverv Agreements <br /> <br />1, The tenns of the Recovery Agreement are binding on water users. However, the same <br />terms do not apply to other participants in the Program. Water users participation in litigation <br />or other processes could be limited, while other Program participants' participation would be <br />unrestricted. This would put water users at a definite disadvantage that would not apply to <br />other panicipants in the Recovery Program, Or parties outside the Recovery Program. . <br /> <br />2, Recovery agreements: Issues needing to be resolved include <br /> <br />o What is meant by water users not opposing "implementation of Recovery Program as <br />defined in the Recovery Action Plan," (2.A.8,b) <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.