My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02267
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02267
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:14:04 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:13:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/27/1968
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Memos
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />for preventing runoff, so that we can hold this <br />water on the plots when it falls as compared to <br />areas where it is allowed to run off normally. <br />We will be studying such things as the effect <br />of vegetation on the land. We will be studying <br />the effects of various surface soil treatments <br />to prevent evaporation losses back out of those <br />soils and to i~crease intake into them. <br /> <br />We have also been actively involved in <br />laboratory and field studies here at Fort <br />Collins dealing with getting an idea of the <br />kind of numbers we might expect for this kind <br />of thing. For example, about two or three <br />centimeters, possibly an inch, of gravel on the <br />soil surface will greatly prevent evaporation <br />losses back out of that soil, providing, of <br />course, we keep the vegetation off so that <br />transpiration is not a factor. We have been <br />able to show that it seems absolutely possible <br />that we could contribute 12 inches of water a <br />year in a 17 inch rainfall area to the ground <br />water providing we just keep about an inch of <br />gravel on the surface which greatly decreases <br />the evaporation losses. Immediately then it is <br />suggested that we go put an inch of gravel all <br />over eastern Colorado, at least on that land <br />that isn't producing too much at the moment. <br />As I mentioned before, economics of course <br />must come into this. <br /> <br />There are chemical treatments that are <br />promising. We really haven't gotten far <br />enough into it to be able to give too many <br />answers as yet but this is the kind of thing we <br />are doing. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The idea, I think, in summary, is this. <br />Perhaps we have a lot of land in eastern Colo- <br />rado, as well as in many other places, where <br />the actual production of the income to the <br />landowner from that land at the moment is far <br />less than it would be if we could harvest even <br />half of the water that fell on it. Harvest it <br />in one way at least, by putting it back down <br />to the water table. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.