Laserfiche WebLink
<br />., <br /> <br />-. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />IV. Conclusions and Recommendations <br />A. Develop River Stabilization Alternatives. <br />B. Design Stream Stability Monitoring Program. <br />C. Prioritize Locations for Monitoring and Mitigation. <br /> <br />V. Develop Display/Education Materials. <br />A. Review Historic Aerial Photographs. <br />B. Develop Computer Modeling to Evaluate Tradeoffs between low impact short life <br />span strategies and higher cost alternatives. <br />C. Develop land use policy that promotes channel stability and restoration. <br />D. Prepare educational materials to help water users and local regulatory entities better <br />manage river flood plain. <br /> <br />VI. Demonstration Project: Immediate Issues <br /> <br />Under the direction of Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and District staff, <br />perform the following tasks that will be prioritized through field inspection and public meetings: <br /> <br />A. Remove major debris buildup in the river channel. <br />B. Stabilize critical riverbank erosion areas. <br />C. Remove certain sandbars. <br />D. Protect and stabilize threatened irrigation structures and canals. <br /> <br />No changes or improvements will be made on iUly structure in or near the river without written <br />approval of the changes or improvements and authorization to proceed from its owner. <br /> <br />First Sta~e Plannin~ Study Cost Estimate <br /> <br />Regional GIS Map and Database <br />Engineering for Items II. through V. <br />Demonstration Project Measures <br />Program Coordination and <br />Administrative Costs <br />Total <br /> <br />$ 85,000 <br />$140,000 <br />$ 50,000 <br /> <br />$25 000 <br />$300,000 <br /> <br />Funcling Sources <br /> <br />Requested CWCB Grant <br />Agencies and Entities that have <br />Indicated Interest and Support* <br />Total <br /> <br />$270,000 <br /> <br />$10,000 <br />$300,000 <br /> <br />3 <br />