My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02257
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02257
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:14:00 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:13:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/13/1963
Description
Table of Contents, Agenda and Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. KUIPER: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. KUIPER: <br /> <br />.j<::>~ <br /> <br />sense, that the bill was improperly drawn, that <br />if it passed it should state the specific pur- <br />poses for which it was appropriated and not <br />identify it with the basic ground water program." <br /> <br />"Any other conunents on Senate Bill No. 123? <br />If not, let's go to the next one." <br /> <br />"Senate Bill No. 239, by Senator Donnelly, <br />has been printed. It deals with 'Water Conser- <br />vancy Districts' and what it does is to change <br />the break point for the change in permissible <br />mill levies. This, I understand, was made to <br />make well the Trinidad Conservancy District <br />because of their loss in assessed valuation <br />over the past several years. The conservancy <br />district law, as it stands, does not give them <br />enough appropriation to do the things that they <br />must do for that project. I personally see <br />nothing objectionable in it. I think it's fair <br />and safe to say that this does increase the <br />potential mill levy in conservancy districts in <br />that it raises the limit of assessed valuation <br />of the district for the l~ and 3 mill levies, <br />from $10 million to $20 million. <br /> <br />Again, I certainly don't see any objection <br />to it. I don't know that the Boa~d needs to <br />take any position. This again is a matter of <br />bringing the Board up to date as to what the <br />Legislature is considering in the field of con- <br />servancy districts." <br /> <br />"Senate Concurrent Resolution No.9." <br /> <br />"This has been printed. It is by Senator <br />Fulghum, 'Submitting to the Qualified Electors <br />of the State of Colorado an Amendment to Section <br />6 of Article XVI of the Constitution of the State <br />of Colorado, relating to the Appropriation and <br />Use for Beneficial purposes of the Waters of <br />the Natural Streams of Colorado and providing <br />for the Adoption of a Master plan for Use of the <br />Remaining Unappropriated Waters and Recognizing <br />Certain Preferences to the Use of Water in the <br />Basins of Origin'. Now this is essentially a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.