Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Agenda Item 8g <br />September 24-25,2001 Board Meeting <br />Page 3 of5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />On the other hand, the "interim period" mav not be over if in declaring the <br />surplus the conserved water can be identified and accounted for or if California <br />does not submit any water orders to Reclamation that go unfulfilled. <br />We have reviewed the CRBSCA and the language in Section 102(a) is <br />specific about the duration of the interim period for temporary use of water <br />conserved by lining a portion of the Coachella Canal: <br /> <br />"", The interim period shall commence on completion of construction or lining <br />said canal and shall end the first year that the Secretary delivers main stream <br />Colorado River water to California in an amount less than the sum of the <br />quantities requested by (1) the California agencies under contracts made <br />pursuant to section 617d of this title, and (2) Federal establishments to meet <br />their water rights acquired in California in accordance with the Supreme Court <br />decree in Arizona against California (376 U.S, 340)." <br /> <br />Furthermore, in House of Representatives Report No. 93-1057 (May 22, 1974) on <br />the CRBSCA at page 16, it states regarding this issue: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />".., The use of credits for the Coachella Canal salvage by the United States is <br />temporary and ends when the Secretary of the Interior delivers less water to <br />California users than requested bv those users, This is expected to occur when <br />the Central Arizona Project becomes operative. The United States will obtain <br />no permanent right to the use of the water salvaged through Coachella Canal <br />lining or reconstruction. " <br /> <br />Special Ambassador Herbert Brownell stated at page 31 of his "Report of the <br />President's Special Representative for Resolution of the Colorado River Salinity . <br />Problem with Mexico" (December 28, 1972): <br /> <br />",.,The fCoachella Valley County Irrigation} District and the appropriate <br />authorities of the State of California have expressed their concurrence in the <br />use by the United States of the water which could be salvaged and in the <br />reduction of diversions to the Coachella Canal by a like amount until <br />California's Colorado River diversions are reduced to 4,4 million acre-feet <br />annually - that is, most likely until the Central Arizona Irrigation Project <br />begins diversions, which will not be before 1982..." <br /> <br />A similar statement by Representative Johnson of California appears in the <br />Congressional Record for June 11, 1974, at page 18790: <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />",.. When the central Arizona project is completed and the State of California is <br />obliged, in accordance with the terms of the Supreme Court decree in Arizona <br />against California, to reduce its diversions from the Colorado River to 4.400,000 <br />acre-feet annually, the use of Coachella salvage water for replacement will <br />terminate, By then a source of replacement water is expected to have been <br />identified as pointed out above, " <br />