My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02223
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02223
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:13:35 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:12:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/23/2001
Description
Draft RICD Rules
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />COLORADO WATER CONSERV ATlON BOARD <br /> <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />. Bill Owens, Governor <br />Greg Walcher, DNR Executive Director <br />Rod Kuharich, CWCB Director July 2001 <br /> <br />FACT SHEET CONCERNING IN-CHANNEL <br />RECREATIONAL DIVERSIONS <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />In 1992 the Colorado Supreme Court held that entities may <br />obtain a water right for a flow within a stream channel if <br />the entity controls the water to serve the intended purpose. <br />The decision allowed Fort Collins to obtain a water right <br />for 30 cfs in the summer and 5-cfs in the winter for a boat <br />chute located on the Cache La Poudre River. <br /> <br />In 1999 another decree was awarded to Littleton for 100 cfs <br />for its kayaking course on the South Platte River. <br /> <br />.In 2001, the City of Golden obtained a water right decree <br />for up to 1000 cfs in Clear Creek - essentially all the <br />available flow. <br /> <br />Because "control" was not statutorily defined and the Fort <br />Collins decision is very broad, entities could have obtained <br />a water right without having done much to the stream. <br /> <br />In December 2000, applications were filed by Breckenridge <br />and the Eagle County Water and Sanitation District (Vail), <br />and by the Browns (citizens in water division 4), each <br />claiming a large portion ofthe available water in the river. <br /> <br />Then, in the 200 I legislative session, the Colorado General <br />Assembly acted by passing SB 01-216, which includes <br />provisions requiring the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board (CWCB) to make findings and adopt rules consistent <br />with the bill. <br /> <br />The CWCB is holding public hearings about the rules and <br />will begin the formal rule-making process in fall 200 1. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Boat chutes exist or are being designed in: <br />Aspen Boulder Denver Durango <br />Fort Collins Golden Grand Junction <br />Gunnison Littleton (South Suburban) <br />Littleton (Union Avenue) Ouray <br />Salida Stearnboat Springs <br /> <br />Pueblo <br />Vail <br /> <br /> <br />Summary <br /> <br />SB 01-216, signed into law on June <br />5,2001, provides: <br /> <br />· That only local governments can <br />obtain recreational water rights. <br /> <br />. A definition of ''beneficial use" <br />to include in-channel diversions. <br /> <br />· For the CWCB to make findings <br />regarding the protection of <br />Colorado's interstate compact <br />entitlements; the appropriateness <br />of the strearn reach for the <br />intended use; reasonable & <br />appropriate water use and to <br />submit its findings to water court. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.