BOARD02207

• Board Meeting Date: 1/12/1998
• Description: Flood Section - Statewide River Rehabilitation and Floodplain Management Needs Inventory
• Board Meetings - Doc Type: Memo

e

e

e

Need

Figure 3
FUNDING IMPLEMENTATION

. Lack of Funding
. Did Not Have A Funding Mechanism
. Desire Funding
. Planning Assistance for Planning and Implementing

Preferences

60
~
'2
~
E
E 50
o
<.l
~
E
:n e 40
0-
5 $
o.c
. 0
. 0.
~ l3 30
o "
~ ~
" 0
E c
i € 20
e
o
E
~ 10
~
,C
>-
~
~

o

t

Funding Mechanism Preferences

j

.
~
~
c
ornl/l
, .
o.
ELL
"
ij)

.
~
~
c
~~
E"
"
ij)

~.~_~I~

0 ~ ~
. c c E
. i'5 i'5
LL 0
C C ,-
:;; ~ ~ C
LL LL~
0 ,C
" ~ :;; u
,C.
. 0:2
'0
.
LL

Note I: 36% of respondents stated a lack of funding was the primary obstacle to planning and implementing
improvements.

u
'0
o.~
"0
6c
u.
'OE
o.
o >
-0
LL,
..
E

:g
1;;
-go
,C -
o c
, .
2 E
~ .
>=:ij'
c
~
:2

x
~
....
.
o
"
<ij
'0
.
..
w

~
c
'5
'0'0
> C
. ~
ceLL
. C
'O~
.~.9
1ii
ij)
Type of Funding Mechanisms

.
c
~
'"

Note 2: 70% of respondents stated they did not have a funding mechanism or had an ineffective funding mechanism.

Note 3: Other preferences include Loans, No Tax-Based Funding, State Funding, Cost Share Program, Go Co
Money, Capital Projects,