Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br /> <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />I3 I 3 Shennan Street, Room 721 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3441 <br />FAX: (303) 866.4474 <br />www.cwcb.state.co.u5 <br /> <br />Q <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br /> <br />Greg E. Wa1cher <br />Executive Director <br /> <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board Members <br />Dan McAuliffe <br />November 9, 2001 ~ <br /> <br />Rod Kuharich <br />Director <br /> <br />Dan McAuliffe <br />Deputy Director <br /> <br />RE: Agenda Item #27c - Fish and Wildlife Resources Fund <br />Replacement of Funds and New Authorization <br /> <br />In 1988 the Colorado General Assembly created a Fish and Wildlife Resources Fund within the <br />Construction Fund and $5 million was placed in the fund. <br /> <br />Since 1988 the money has been spent: <br />. $1,25 million for the Grand V alley Water Management Program. <br />. $2 million for the Native Aquatic Species Facility. <br />. $1,28 million for purposes related to the Wolford Mountain Reservoir Project <br />. $400,000 for the purposes related to the Stagecoach Project <br />. $1 million for the Native Species Conservation Trust Fund. <br /> <br />And, when the General Assembly created the Platte River Coordinator position in 1999, a footnote was <br />added to the Long Bill. The footnote indicates that although the positiDn and the operating costs <br />associated with the duties of the coordinator are annually appropriated via the Long Bill, the fund source <br />is the Fish and Wildlife Resources Fund. <br /> <br />As a result of continual annual appropriations ($378,036 in FY 00, $377,563 in FY 01 and $233, 916 in <br />FY 02) there is less than $50,000 remaining in the fund. <br /> <br />In creating the fund, the General Assembly stated that fish and wildlife resources affected by the <br />construction, operation, or maintenance of water diversion, delivery, or storage facilities should be <br />mitigated. It also stated there should be a balance between the development of the state's water resources <br />and the protection of the state's fish and wildlife resources, because fish and wildlife resources are a <br />matter of statewide concern. <br /> <br />As a result, water developers were encouraged to submit grant applications for funds to mitigate project <br />impacts. <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Project Planning & Finance. Stream & Lake Protection. <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning <br /> <br />I <br />