Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Biological Flow Recommendation <br /> <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />output from the R2Cross data collected. to develop the initial, biologic instream flow <br />recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic <br />requirements of each stream without regard to water availability. Three instream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity are used to develop <br />biologic instream flow recommendations. The USFS has determined that maintaining these <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996). <br /> <br />For this segment of stream, 3 data sets were collected with .the results shown in Table 1 below. <br />Table 1 shows who collected the data (Party), the date the data was collected (Date), the <br />measured discharge at the time of the survey (Q), the accuracy range of the predicted flows <br />based on Manning's Equation (240% and 40% of Q), the summer flow recommendation based <br />on meeting 3 of 3 hydraulic criteria and the winter flow recommendation based upon 2 of 3 <br />hydraulic criteria. As indicated in the table only one of the cross sections meet the <br /> <br />Table 1: Data <br />Party X-see <br /> <br />Date Q <br /> <br />Z50%-40% <br /> <br />1.125 - .18 <br /> <br />Slimmer <br />3/3 <br />3.03 <br /> <br />Winter (2/3) <br /> <br />USFS # 1 <br /> <br />6/18/2003 .45 cfs <br /> <br />. 1 <br /> <br /> <br />USPS #3 <br /> <br />6/18/2003 1.36 cfs <br /> <br />3.4 - .544 <br /> <br />4.5 <br /> <br />3.6 <br /> <br />USFS = Bureau of Land Management DQW = Division of Wildlife <br />(1) Predicted flow outside of the accuracy range of Manning's Equation. ? = Criteria never met in R2CROSS Staging Table. <br /> <br />Biologic Flow Recommendation <br />The spring/summer flow recommendation, which meets 3 of 3 criteria (x-section 2 and 3), and is <br />within the accuracy range of the R2CROSS model, is 3.2 cfs (See Table 1). The winter flow <br />recommendation, which meets 2 of 3 criteria (x-section 1 and 2), and is within the accuracy <br />range of the R2CROSS model, is 1.0 cfs (See 'table 1). It is our belief that recommendations <br />that fall outside of the accuracy range of the model, over 250% of the measured discharge or <br />under 40% of the measured discharge may not give art accurate 'estimate of the necessary <br />instream flow required. <br /> <br />Hydrologic Data <br />After receiving the cooperating agehcy's biologic recommendation, the CWCB staff conducted <br />an evaluation of the stream hydrology to determine if water was physically available for an <br />instream flow appropriation. The hydrograph below was derived from data collected by the <br />USGS stream gage for West Hubbard Creek neat I'aonia, CO (ID #09132900), which has a <br />drainage area of 2.4 square miles (See Gage Summl\ry in Appendix C). The total drainage area <br />of the Dyke Creek Drainage is approximately 4.7 square miles. The period of record for this <br />gage was 1955-1965, the period of record used by staff in their analysis was 1960-1973, or 13 <br /> <br />- 4- <br />