My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02163
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02163
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:12:58 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:11:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/25/2005
Description
ISF Section - Instream Flow Appropriations - Anthracite Creek
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Land Status Review <br /> <br /> Total Length Land Ownership <br />Upper Terminus Lower Terminus (miles) % Private % Public <br />Ruby Anthracite Coal Creek 8.0 49% 51 % <br />Creek <br /> <br />51 % of the reach is located on public lands and 49% of the reach is located on private lands. <br /> <br />Biological Data <br /> <br />The CDOW has conducted field surveys of the fishery resources on this stream and have found a <br />natural environment that can be preserved. As reported in the letter from the CDOW to the <br />CWCB "Anthracite Creek is classified as a river (between 60 to 99 feet wide) and fishery <br />surveys indicate the stream environment of Anthracite Creek supports a self-sustaining brown <br />and rainbow trout fishery. Anthracite Creek also supports populations of mottled sculpins, dace <br />and bluehead suckers" (See CDOW Fish Survey in Appendix B). <br /> <br />Field Survey Data <br /> <br />CDOW staff used the R2CROSS methodology to quantify the amount of water required to <br />preserve the natural environment to a reasonable degree. The R2CROSS method requires that <br />stream discharge and channel profile data be collected in a riffle stream habitat type. Riffles are <br />most easily visualized, as the stream habitat types that would dry up first should streamflow <br />cease. This type of hydraulic data collection consists of setting up a transect, surveying the <br />stream channel geometry, and measuring the stream discharge. Appendix B contains copies of <br />field data collected for this proposed segment. <br /> <br />Biological Flow Recommendation <br /> <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />output from the R2CROSS data collected to develop the initial, biologic instream flow <br />recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic <br />requirements of each stream without regard to water availability. Three instream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity are used to develop <br />biologic instream flow recommendations. The CDOW has determined that maintaining these <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996). <br /> <br />For this segment of stream, three data sets were collected with the results shown in Table 1 <br />below. Table 1 shows who collected the data (Party), the date the data was collected (Date), the <br />measured discharge at the time of the survey (Q), the accuracy range of the predicted flows <br />based on Manning's Equation (240% and 40% of Q), the summer flow recommendation based <br />on meeting 3 of 3 hydraulic criteria and the winter flow recommendation based upon 2 of 3 <br />hydraulic criteria. <br /> <br />- 3 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.