My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02156
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02156
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:12:53 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:11:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/16/2006
Description
ISF Section - ISF Subcommittee Recommendations
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />-4 - <br /> <br />or take any other action that would reduce flows in the affected stream below the decreed <br />ISF amount-in other words, the Board would no longer accept the injury because the . <br />mitigation no longer would be in effect. . <br />e. A term providing that the water court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of <br />the stipulation as a water matter. . <br />f. A requirement that the proponent install (or commit to pay operation and maintenance <br />costs if the CWCB installs) any measuring devices deemed necessary by the Division <br />Engineer to administer the terms of the stipulation and decree implementing the Injury <br />with Mitigation pretrial resolution. <br />g. Where applicable, a statement that the proponent's use of its water rights (or other <br />relevant acts) shall not be deemed to injure the ISF water right due to the mitigation <br />provided by the proponent. <br /> <br />6. Circumstances Under Which Off-site Mitigation Might Be Acceptable <br /> <br />The Subcommittee discussed the question of when off-site; mitigation would be <br />acceptable. The Subcommittee recommends that the Board consider off-site mitigation as a last <br />resort and that it only consider mitigation in an area other than the affected stream reach if no <br />reasonable alternative exists for mitigation on the affected stream reach. Factors that the Board <br />might consider in looking at such a proposal include the degree and frequency of impact to the <br />affected stream, the environmental benefits provided to the off-site stream by the mitigation and <br />whether the proposal could, in effect, constitute a modification of the ISF water right on the <br />affected stream or result in a selective subordination of the affected ISF water right. <br /> <br />Subcommittee Recommendation <br /> <br />:1 <br /> <br />The ISF Subcommittee recommends that the Board concur with the above-described <br />approach to implementing ISF Rule 8i(3) (Injury with Mitigation). <br /> <br />\. <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Water Project Planning and Finance. Stream and lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.