My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02137
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02137
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:12:40 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:11:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/20/2000
Description
Platte River Basin Issues - Denver Director's Report - Proposal for South Platte Protection Plan
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />preliminary consideration or from projects that are yet to be anticipated. The South Platte <br />Protection Plan is intended neither to prohibit nor allow development of those water supplies. <br />Numerous laws and regulations provide substantial protection for the values on the stream. <br />Each project will be considered on a case by case basis and evaluated on its own merits at <br />the time of application. Endorsement of this plan does not indicate support for any project. <br /> <br />Projects are or may be proposed by a variety of water providers including, but not limited to, <br />the cities of Aurora, Denver and Thornton and the counties of Arapahoe, Jefferson and <br />Douglas. Other water could be introduced into the South Platte from or through the <br />Arkansas basin. Denver intends to divert more water from Dillon down the North Fork as <br />demand increases, and may consider expansion of existing reservoirs on the South Platte. <br />There is discussion between Denver, Aurora and others about possibly expanding Antero <br />Reservoir. <br /> <br />AREA AFFECTED <br /> <br />The South Platte Protection Plan generally addresses the same area as recommended for <br />designation by Alternative B. That includes the South Platte mainstem from below <br />Elevenmile Reservoir to the Confluence of the mainstem with the North Fork of the South <br />Platte River, and the North Fork from Insmont to the Confluence. However, this Proposal <br />expands that area by its recommendation for a USFS/State Parks partnership along the <br />mainstem from Elevenmile Reservoir all the way to Chatfield Reservoir (both are currently <br />state parks), including Cheesman Reservoir. Portions of the North Fork would be managed <br />by Jefferson County Open Space and the US Forest Service. The width of the area <br />protected is generally considered to be 1/4 mile from each side of the river. However, it <br />should be noted that the US Forest Service is not limited on federal lands to the 1/4 mile <br />rule, and it is recommended that the river valley within federally managed lands be planned <br />and managed in a manner compatible with adjacent uses and Values. Similarly, the lands <br />owned by Denver Water and Jefferson County Open Space often extend more than 1/4 mile <br />from the river, and such outlying lands will also be considered for a role in protecting or <br />enhancing the river values. Precise boundaries should be fixed by recreation management <br />agencies following a comprehensive recreation management plan. <br /> <br />BENEFITS OF THE SOUTH PLATTE PROTECTION PLAN <br /> <br />Numerous immediate benefits to the values on the South Platte will be achieved through the <br />South Platte Protection Plan. The Plan provides for local governments, water providers, and <br />state and federal governments to combine their capabilities while maintaining an important <br />level of water management flexibility. This kind of synergy may be effective in protecting and <br />balancing the many uses on the river. <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.