Laserfiche WebLink
<br />40 <br /> <br />MR. METZGER: Can'twe~et around that' <br />MR. STONE: Our Congress would have to. say that the <br />Estes Park soenlo values are ln the natlonal lnterest and <br />this ~dditlonal oOst wl11 be written off, in whloh event the <br />taxpayers will pay the cost. It ls anybody's guess .what Con~ <br />grsss would do if the matter were plaoed squarely betore Con~ <br />gl'sss. But the 11nes are undel' OOl'lstruotlon. The Bureau, I <br />presume, will make a decls10n soon. <br />MR. METZGER: Can't we get at 1t by l'at1fy1ng your <br />decis10n' <br />MR. BEATY: Do you want a motion approv1ng your action' <br />MR. CROSS: Most of these lines are outside of the <br />Nat10nal Park. <br />MR. STONE: None of them ln the Nat10nal Park. <br />HR. HUGHES: Ith1nkwe ought to take a mot10n on thls <br />Nat10~al Park situation. Yesterday I signed a right-of-way <br />for six ml1es ofA. E. A. line. I didn't want to have a llne <br />thel'e, but good :Lord, why should I stand 11'1 the way of it, <br />MR. PUGHE: Were these lines originally designed 11'1 <br />the Colorado-Big Thompson proJeot or 1s it something new' <br />MR.. STONE: We11, they wel'e originally deslgned w1th <br />the project. <br />MR. CROSS: I move that this Board endorse the actlon <br />taken by the Direotor ln presenting ~he matter at the hearing <br />1i1 Estes Park on Apr11 26. <br />