Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Imperial Valley district plans to reline canal to prevent Seepage (LA Times, <br />May 6): <br /> <br />MEXICALI, Mexico -- Farmer Bernardo Gonzalez has tilled the Mexicali Valley <br />for more than half a century, but he says he's never had a harvest as bitter as <br />the one he fears he'll reap soon: crops withered by their loss of <br />precious Colorado River water. <br /> <br />The leathery but still agile 82-year-old is caught in the currents of an <br />international water dispute that could leave him and 2,500 other Mexican <br />farmers in Baja California high and dry, one of an increasing number of <br />conflicts that characterize U.S.-Mexico border water policy. <br /> <br />"We're afraid of what might happen," said Gonzalez, who has worked his 45 acres <br />since 1937, when Mexican President Lazaro Cardenas gave him expropriated land. <br />"This is one of the most valuable farms around here. But it won't be if they <br />put cement in the canal." He's referring to the All-American Canal, which since <br />1944 has transported water from the Colorado River westward into California's <br />Imperial Valley, helping turn a desolate and arid wasteland into a $l-billion- <br />a-year farm economy. <br /> <br />The canal's operator, the Imperial Irrigation District, says it will soon begin <br />a project to reline a porous 23-mile section of the canal, converting it from <br />clay to concrete. That would save the vast amounts of water lost to seepage but <br />would devastate Gonzalez and the other farmers who have come to depend on it <br />for ground water. <br /> <br />The Mexican government isn't taking the plan lying down. Mexican authorities, <br />from Baja Gov. Eugenio Elorduy to Cabinet members, have complained to the U.S. <br />government to stop the project, so far to no avail. Mexico says it violates a <br />1944 water accord that calls on the United States to consult with Mexico on any <br />project that affects water supplies. <br /> <br />The State Department and an international body meant to settle water disputes <br />between the U.S. and Mexico have said California is legally entitled to line <br />the canal. And whereas officials in California are unwilling to back down from <br />the lining project, they have discussed the possibility of "good faith" <br />projects on the U.S. side of the border to increase the quantity and quality of <br />Colorado River water that Mexico gets. <br /> <br />The stakes are high. Seepage totaling as much as 2% of all the <br />transported from the Colorado River to the Imperial Valley has <br />prosperity to the northeast Mexicali Valley, which is what the <br />is called south of the border. Losing it would create economic, <br />environmental problems, Baja officials warn. <br /> <br />water <br />brought <br />Imperial Valley <br />social and <br /> <br />"We are concerned with any possibility of significant reduction of what we <br />recelve from the Colorado River," Mexican Foreign Minister Jorge Castaneda said <br />Friday. "That's where we get our water from." <br /> <br />Castaneda's advisor on binational water issues, Ambassador Alberto Szekely, <br />said in an interview this week that Mexico is about to step up the pressure to <br />have the project stopped or changed. <br /> <br />54 <br />