My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02099
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02099
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:11:53 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:10:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/20/2002
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />EP A Limits Ruling Requiring Permits For Aquatic Herbicide Use: The EP A has released guidance <br />concluding that the application of herbicides to irrigation canals does not require Clean Water Act permits, <br />EP A issued the guidance memo on Mar. 29 to all regional administrators, The memo argues that the <br />application of herbicides to irrigation canals does not fall under the Clean Water Act's effiuent discharge <br />permit program because amendments specifically exempted "irrigation retum flow" from the law's <br />jurisdiction, EP A also asserts that irrigators who use the herbicide in accordance with the label instructions in <br />order to "ensure the passage of irrigation return flows" do not need to apply for discharge permits because <br />such activity is not a "point source" discharge, and therefore not subject to the Clean Water Act. The memo <br />specifically says that the guidance does affect point source discharges into irrigation canals that are <br />considered "water[ s] ofthe United States," which could still leave irrigation districts vulnerable to <br />enforcement cases or environmentalists filing citizen suits, <br /> <br />Meanwhile, environmentalists in Oregon have threatened to sue three irrigation districts under the citizen suit <br />provisions of the Clean Water Act unless the districts apply for discharge permits before using herbicides, <br />They sent the districts 60-day notices of intent to sue last month, but the lawsuit will likely take on greater <br />importance as a challenge to the agency's newly released guidance, <br /> <br />At issue is a March 2001 ruling by the U.S, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Headwaters, Inc, v, <br />Talent Irrigation District, requiring that herbicide sprayers obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination <br />System (NPDES) permit under the Clean Water Act before applying a common weed-and algae control <br />chemical to irrigation waterways, In May 2001, the agency issued a memo to regional administrators <br />declaring that forcing irrigators to obtain permits would be a "low enforcement priority," in a move that gave <br />water users temporary relief from federal enforcement, but still left them vulnerable to citizen enforcement <br />suits, <br /> <br />"Most Endangered Rivers" Announced: The environmental group American Rivers has released its <br />annual "Most Endangered Rivers" list. No Colorado rivers are on the list, A summary of this year's listed <br />rivers can be found at vV\\T<..\r.atnerical1rivers.org/n1ostendangered2002/index.htr01. <br /> <br />Statewide Issues <br /> <br />Map Modernization Plan: On April 17 we received a letter from the FEMA Region VIII Director <br />confirming there will be a substantial increase FEMA's flood-mapping budget in Fiscal Year 2003, The <br />letter solicited an application for a $50,000 grant to prepare a Colorado Map Modernization Implementation <br />Plan (MMIP), The plan must be submitted by Sept, 15 and would become part of a national MMIP that <br />would guide the expenditure of the mapping funds, The President's 2003 budget proposes $351 million -- a <br />$300 million increase, The agency's Fiscal Year 2004 and 2005 budgets indicate the high level of funding <br />will continue, <br /> <br />We responded to the solicitation and are working to select a consultant to assist with the preparation of the <br />MMIP if funds are provided, A central component of the process will be a series of meetings with local <br />officials to identifY flood insurance and mapping needs, After the meetings we will prepare a prioritized list <br />of mapping needs for communities throughout Colorado (a total of 333 counties, cities, and towns), That list <br />will include specific numbers of stream miles for each community and dollar estimates of the cost to map <br />those stream miles, The list will form the basis of the MMIP for Colorado, <br /> <br />If the President's proposal is approved by Congress, the CWCB expects that funds in the range of $3 million <br />to $5 million per year could become available about January 1,2003, <br /> <br />Statewide Drainage and Floodplain Management Criteria Manual - WRC Engineering has submitted the <br />initial draft version of the Statewide Drainage and Floodplain Management Criteria Manual for all chapters <br />included Phase I. We have also nearly completed our review ofthe draft and will forward our comments to <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.