Laserfiche WebLink
<br />State, districts (K-12), industry, water districts, watershed groups and assembly, developers, federal agencies, <br />academia, RMWEA, local government, research institutions, wastewater, environmental groups <br />Group two: <br />Division of Wildlife, news media, agriculture industry/state agriculture Department, landscaping/nursery, <br />environmental groups (e.g. Sierra Club, Nature Conservancy), CDPHE, state climatologist, water attorney, <br />Ph.D. hydrologist (USGS or university), CWC, developer/real estate, state representative, financial person, <br />educator - science coordinator, U.S. Forest Service, Colo.Geo10gical Survey, Colo. State Parks, 4-H clubs <br />Suggested that rnight want to hire lobbyist <br />Group three: <br />Representation statewide: river basins educators developers recreationists water providers scientists <br />watersheds agriculture general population <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4. Who should be on the Board of Directors? Comments two groups <br />See stakeholders in question 3 <br />People with money and power <br /> <br />5. What type of geographical representation is needed? <br />Can look at from two perspectives: watershed or population as <br />represented in the state legislature (House of Representatives) <br />By watershed - includes water rights, geographically inclusive <br />By population - more representation from Front Range <br /> <br />Attachment B -- April 30 Water Education Provider Meeting Comments <br />Participants responded to two questions at the end of the meeting. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Comments are listed after each question. <br /> <br />Question 1. How did this water provider meeting meet your needs? <br />Responses: <br />-great forum for communication of ideas and water education programs <br />(two participants) <br />-gained information about how different groups provide oiltreach on <br />water education (four participants) <br />-great opportunity to meet new/useful contacts - networking <br />(two participants) <br />-leamed about high quality resources can use in curriculum work <br />(two participants) <br />-see need for ongoing coordination of Colorado water education information and resources, pre-kindergarten <br />- adult <br />-coordinator can help get out message on Colorado water ilse <br />-learned about diversity of water education effort and about many <br />new resources and complexities . <br />-learned about how there might be water education efforts that <br />overlap and some possible gaps <br />-learned how much work is needed in water education <br /> <br />Question 2. What are future needs for water education? <br />Responses: <br />-continue water provider meetings (6 participants) <br /> <br />e <br />