Laserfiche WebLink
<br />This will be the largest one that the state government has actually <br />assisted in. Since the reservoir will be located on federal land, we <br />must go to exhaustive lengths to ensure the design adequacy and safety <br />of the dam. We see no major problem with it. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />If the bonds can be marketed, and if SB 69 passes, this board will be <br />in a position to immediately advance the one million dollars. That will <br />be contingent, of course, on the remainder of the financing being <br />available. <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: I would like to express my thanks to Larry and his staff <br />and, in particular, to Nick Ioannides, who has been most helpful in <br />overcoming road blocks. without their help, we wouldn't be where we <br />are. <br /> <br />MR. SPARKS: The next subject I have, Mr. Chairman, is On the weather <br />modification program. We are still carrying on the program. We did <br />suspend the program in the Steamboat Springs area, because the snowpack <br />was extremely high up there. We were getting some complaints of too <br />much snow. We will never be able to satisfy all the interests with the <br />weather modification program. Either we get too much snow or we get too <br />little. We never get just the right amount. <br /> <br />We are continuing on the program throughout the rest of the state and <br />will continue through April 30. The snowpackis extremely favorable in <br />most of the areas west of the Continental Divide. There is still a <br />moisture deficiency here east of the Continental Divide, particularly <br />from Denver on east in the high plains area. There is also an existing <br />deficiency in the Arkansas Valley. The most critical deficiency is in <br />the Rio Grande Basin, the San Luis Valley. Otherwise, we are running <br />to almost 175 percent in various places in Western Colorado. The run- <br />off looks quite favorable, although there are many factors that are yet <br />unknown. For instance, how the weather will be, whether we have con- <br />tinuing winds that evaporate the moisture, or how fast the weather warms <br />up. There are many other factOrs that determine the runoff other than <br />the snowpack itself. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The U. S. Geological Survey estimates indicate that, of allcthe pre- <br />cipitation that falls in Colorado, estimated at about 90 million acre- <br />feet a year, 83 percent of that evaporates before it ever reaches our <br />rivers and streams. That 83 percent evaporates and we cannot measure <br />it. You can see that the wind and weather has a tremendous impact upon <br />the snowpack. At least at this time it looks very favorable, assuming <br />that we have normal precipitation for the remainder of the year. There <br />is one thing in Our favor--nobody can argue this year that the weather <br />modification program was a failure. There is still a question of how <br />much additional snow the program produced. A good many people are sold <br />on the program, and they are hard after us to do it again next year. <br />We think, indeed, that there must be a long-range weather modification <br />program carried on in the state of Colorado. We see no other way of <br />getting additional water in this state. We are not going to get any <br />from any other source. We are working hard at the staff level to come <br />up with a permanent, long-range program. The Legislature directed this <br />-year that the Board prepare a comprehensive report on this year's <br /> <br />-29- <br />