My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02091
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02091
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:11:37 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:09:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/16/1978
Description
Agenda, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I agree with, Mr. Balcomb that it is a gamble; if, in fact, his position <br />is correct and SB 97 is either unconstitutional or il'legal, at least as <br />far as the filings the Board has made under the bill. They are cer- <br />tainly in question. I question whether all the work is for naught. <br />Most certainly, surveys of this sort are going to have to. be done at <br />some time. So I think what the Board needs. to. weigh, Mr. Chairman, is <br />: whether' they think'the priority date is of some importance. And, if <br />it is" certainly the Board's actions have not been for naught at all. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON:. It seems to me :that as a matter of responsibility we <br />cannot assume that any:thing- is. unconsti:tutional or illegaL <br /> <br />MR. <br />the <br />the <br /> <br />ROBBINS: <br />actions of <br />contrary. <br /> <br />I would agree with that. I think the presumption is that <br />the Legislature ar~. constitutional and legal, and not <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: If we let attorneys file challenges to everything: and <br />then just quit dead, they could raise their hourly rate about a 100 <br />percent; and we wouldn't even be worried about Xeroxing charges. <br />(Laughter,. ) <br /> <br />Ken, I' just don't see any other way that we can proceed. Maybe: we will <br />have 'to take another look at it iF a district court would declare it <br />unconstitutional or illega'L. But lIP to that time, a clear mandate to <br />work out what the Legislature said was our responsibility,~we have. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. BALCOMB: I just point out the cost. I just started, of course. <br />You have to take into consideration the filing place--Steamboat Springs, <br />all the protests that were filed. . Now, somebody is paying this bill, <br />and nobody seems to care about that. <br /> <br />-12- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.