My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02058
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02058
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:10:34 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:08:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/18/2005
Description
Report of the Attorney General
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~' <br /> <br />'i'1 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />;A<{b <br /> <br />Before the Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Concerning the Application for Water Rights of the <br />Upper GUlll1ison River Water Conservancy District <br />in the Gunnison River <br />In Gunnison County <br />Cynthia F, Covell, #10169 Case Number: 4-02CW038 <br />Alperstein & Covell, p,c. <br />Gilbert y, Marchand, Jr" Of Counsel, #19870 <br />1600 Broadway, #2350 <br />Denver, CO 80202-4923 <br />Phone: (303) 894-8191 <br />Fax: (303) 861-0420 <br />cfc@alpersteincovell,com <br />gym@gymlaw,com <br />UPPER GUNNISON'S RESPONSE TO STAFF MEMORANDUM REGARDING <br />BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES <br /> <br />Applicant, Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District ( "Upper Gunnison"), <br /> <br />through its undersigned attorneys, submits the following response to the CWCB staffs <br /> <br />memorandum dated July 11, 2005 ("staff memorandum.") <br /> <br />By recommending that this Board allow another evidentiary hearing, the staff <br /> <br />memorandum asks this Board to violate the water court's June 16,2005 remand order.! In <br /> <br />unambiguous terms, that order requires the CWCB to "make its findings on the existing record," <br /> <br />The Board will violate the remand order if it adopts the procedure requested by staff, which <br /> <br />entails presentation of additional evidence, <br /> <br />1 Applicant finds incredible staffs decision to present to the Board a proposal to take <br />new evidence without mentioning the potential violation of a court order, particularly since the <br />author of the memorandum is himself a lawyer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.