My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02033
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:10:20 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:08:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/8/1963
Description
Minutes
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. PETERSON: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. KUIPER: <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: <br /> <br />MR. KUIPER: <br /> <br />would probably not go into one of these expen- <br />sive type feasibility investigations. Does that <br />answer your question?" <br /> <br />"Yes, that answers my question. Thank you." <br /> <br />"l^le'll now go on to the next agenda item, <br />please." <br /> <br />"Can all of the Board members see this map <br />which is up on the board or would it be better <br />to move it over here?" <br /> <br />"I think we can all see it all right." <br /> <br />"I think, gentlemen, that it's necessary to <br />go into a little bit of history on this matter <br />and this is the reason for having prepared this <br />map so that you can see the problem. ~fuen I <br />get through I will have some recommendations to <br />propose to the Board. I want to say now that <br />these recommendations have been previously con- <br />sidered by the Investigation Commission, by the <br />Governor and by the Executive Committee of the <br />Hater Congress. Now, while I do not like to <br />make it a practice to do this sort of thing in <br />not bringing these things out before the Board <br />meetings, let me say that the reason is this, <br />we must make a decision as to Colorado's position <br />on this matter tomorrow in Salt Lake city so <br />there was not time after the Board meeting today <br />to take this thing up with the other people with <br />whom we have discussed it. We felt this is going <br />to be extremely far-reaching and that it would be <br />necessary to get opinions from water users through- <br />out the state who are represented by the Investi- <br />gation commission and by the Colorado ~']ater Con- <br />gress before we go into this and take this posi- <br />tion in Salt Lake City tomorrow. This will be <br />a position made by the Committee of 14 who have <br />been appointed by the governors of the seven <br />Colorado River Basin states and we hope that the <br />powers that be in Washington will listen to the <br />recommendation which we hope to arrive at tomor- <br />row to present to them. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.