Laserfiche WebLink
<br />10/08/98 TKlT 16:08 FAX 1 505 82i6188 <br /> <br />STATE ENGINEER OFFICE <br /> <br />~003 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Jack Garner, Reclamation, presented an overview of ReclarrLation <br /> <br />reservoir operations on the COlorado. Riv;~r and tributaries in <br /> <br />conjunction with Colorado Big Thompson and Fryingpan-Arkansas <br />Proj sets with emphasis on releases from Reudi and other <br /> <br />reservoirs for f.ish. flows. <.. <br /> <br />. Talbreth asked about flood control constraints on reservoir <br /> <br />operations and apparently confused "contract. water demand" . to <br /> <br />be "compact water demand". <br /> <br />. Christine ,Karas, Reclamation, presented an overview or <br /> <br />remaining Reclamation projects in Upper Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />. Horning, Talbreth, and Potter asked about water sales <br /> <br />contracts, trigger for Aspinall Unit Section 7 consultation <br /> <br />and overbank flooding. <br /> <br />. Mark Rucker, Reclamation, and Dick Kreiner, Corps of <br /> <br />Engineers, presented an overview or Reclamation and Corps of <br /> <br />Engineers projects in Rio Grande Basin from headwaters to <br /> <br />mouth of Pecos River. <br /> <br />. Talbreth asked for summary of MOU's between Reclamation and <br /> <br />Corps and other entities, flood control criteria, water <br /> <br />-:. . <br />quali ty monitoring, EIS addressing flexibility on compCl.ct <br /> <br />deliveries and flexibility on constraints in authorizing <br />legislation,~ noting that legislation is not:"set in stone~, <br /> <br />and asked about reasonable and pr~dent alternatives. <br /> <br />3 <br />