My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02010
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:09:58 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:06:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/24/2001
Description
Snowmass Water and Sanitation District 404 Permit
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />Walsh & Walsh then conducted an analysis of variance (ANOV A) statistical test on the <br />data collected to determine if statistically significant differences existed for the variables over <br />changes in stream discharge. The ANOV A test allows for comparisons of variance between <br />groups and tests the null hypothesis that there is no mean difference between redd depths and <br />velocities with changes of discharge. The results section of the report is extensive but we will <br />only report the relevant results. Redd pit and tailspin depths were significantly reduced relative <br />to December ice conditions. Redu<;tions in stream discharge significantly decreased redd pit <br />velocities from 0.71 fils (November 16.9 cfs) to 0.3 ftls (February 8.9 cfs), Reductions in stream <br />flow significantly reduced redd tai1spill velocities from .93 ft/s (November 16.9 cfs) to 0.47 ft/s <br />(February 8,9 cfs), Walsh reports that these velocity reductions were highly significant <br />(p=O.OOOO). The percentage of fines increased significantly over the winter period. <br /> <br />Next, Walsh & Walsh compared their measured velocities at the redds with redd <br />velocities from Habitat Suitability Curves developed by Bovee (1978) and Raleigh et. aI. (1986) <br />for both brook and brown trout spawning sites. These curves provide known optimal velocities <br />at redds for successful reproduction, Walsh used the lowest end ofthe optimal range to remain <br />conservative. The February low flow data of8.9 cfs create "profound reduction of velocity <br />optima," where upstream velocities were reduced by 52% (brook trout) and 92% (brown trout) <br />and mean tailspill velocity was reduced 29% for brook trout and 60% for brown trout. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Walsh & Walsh (1995) also assessed the substrate composition of the redds comparing <br />November to February after several months of decreasing flows. They found that fines increased <br />significantly from 11.1 % in November to 28.9% in February, They cited other studies that found <br />that the percentage of fines in a redd becanle critical at the 20 to 30% level. Again, fines fill the <br />spaces between the gravels preventing oxygen from reaching the incubating eggs and later <br />preventing the sac-fry (aelvins) from leaving the gravel. <br /> <br />This study documents the physical changes that occur at trout redds on Snowmass Creek <br />as flows naturally decrease from fall spawning flows through the winter. The decreases are not <br />entirely natural as the SWSD diverted small amounts of water during the study, The report <br />further evaluates how these physical attribute changes compared to other known studies on the <br />physical requirements for successful trout redds, Obviously, as in any other river system, the <br />trout populations at Snowmass Creek have adapted to the flow regimes and a certain percentage <br />of the redds for the winter of 1994-1995 were not successful. The trout population adjusts to <br />these natural variations. A higher percentage of redds will be successful in higher flow years. <br />The trout population in Snowmass Creek is almost entirely dependent on spawning as the State <br />of Colorado does not stock and whatever private stocking occurred in the past will be even more <br />limited now with the strict state regulations on private stocking aimed at controlling the spread of <br />whirling disease <br /> <br />The State of Colorado has developed a winter minimum flow for Snowmass Creek that <br />incorporates a stair-step or graduated flow based on the hydrologic cycle and the flow year <br />present in the stream. This in-stream flow is a water right held by the State's Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board (CWCB) and it only limits snowmaking diversions for the Snowmass Ski <br />tit Area. The municipal diversions are a water right senior to the CWCB' s in-stream flow right and <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.