My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02010
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:09:58 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:06:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/24/2001
Description
Snowmass Water and Sanitation District 404 Permit
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />f <br /> <br />Cooper observed flows from 13-40 cfs in March and April, 2000, during his <br />study of the impacts of the District's diversions on Snowmass Creek. Thus, he was <br />unable to observe the direct effect on the wetlands of dewatering the stream to the 4 <br />cfs "survival flow" level. Dr. Cooper concluded: <br /> <br />Based on the relationship between stage and discharge at this range of <br />flows, a decrease in the flow-of Snowmass Creek from 16 to 4 cfs would <br />result in a drop in stage of only 1-2 inches, if groundwater recharge rates <br />are linearly related to streamflow. In wetland areas connected to the <br />stream, a stage change of this magnitude would most likely result in a <br />similar decrease in the water table level and beaver pond waterlevels. <br />However, our conclusion is based on the assumption that the <br />relationship between river stage and wetland water levels at flows above <br />16 cfs is als 0 valid for flows as low as 4 cfs. If groundwater recharge <br />rates are non-linearly related to streamflow then floodplain water table <br />declines of 2 feet are possible. At some flow between 16 cfs and 0 cfs <br />the rate of groundwater recharge will drop to a rate insufficient to <br />maintain the current groundwater flow systems through the wetlands. <br />At this flow the rate of recharge will drop substantially and our data set <br />and the rating curves and groundwater level correlations that we have <br />developed cannot predict the resultant wetland water tables. A <br />groundwater level decline of more than 1- 2 feet under wetlands during <br />the winter could allow wetland soils to drain, frost to penetrate, wetland <br />plants that have survived in the unfrozen soils of the Snowmass Creek <br />floodplain and young plants could be damaged or killed. In addition, <br />beaver ponds would dry up depriving any resident beavers of access to <br />food caches. <br /> <br />Ex. 19 at ii-iii. <br /> <br />Thus, diversions at the District's structure directly affect downstream wetlands <br />and beaver ponds. Depletions to the 0-4 cfs level could cause a decline in the water <br />table by as much as two feet. <br /> <br />D. Legal Effect of New Information <br /> <br />As is illustrated by section B above, the District failed to establish a <br />biologically-based survival flow as promised in the 1978 agreements. The District <br />had no discernible basis for its statement that the diversion would not significantly <br />affect the fishery. The failure to do so effectively invalidates the Caucus's withdrawal <br />of its opposition to issuance of the original pennit, and provides one of the bases <br />upon which the COIl'S now should reevaluate the pennit conditions. <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.