My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01989
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:09:42 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:06:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/24/2004
Description
ISF Section - Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District, Case Nos. 4-02CW294 and 4-03CW107, Injury with Mitigation Proposal
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />- 3 - <br /> <br />3) The Applicant has not yet provided information about how many of these wells were in <br />existence at the time the Board made its appropriation on the Slate River. Wells that were <br />operating prior to the time of the Board's appropriation would qualify as pre-existing <br />uses, thereby reducing the injury that the Board would be accepting. <br /> <br />4) It appears from the Applicant's proposal and proposed decree that none of these <br />approximately 115 units would be permitted to have outside uses, but that should be <br />explicitly stated in the proposed decree. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation <br /> <br />As stated above, injury with mitigation is a two-meeting process. At the first meeting, the Board <br />may "conduct a preliminary review of the pretrial resolution during any regularly scheduled meeling <br />to determine whether the natural environment could be preserved to a reasonable degree with the <br />proposed injury or interference if applicant provided mitigation." At a subsequent meeting, the <br />Board may "take final action to ratify, refuse to ratify or ratify with additional conditions." While <br />there are several outstanding issues regarding a final evaluation of the proposal presented by the <br />Applicant, the Staff believes that the Board can make its "preliminary" determination. <br /> <br />Therefore, staffrecommends that the Board: <br /> <br />I) Make the preliminary determination that "the natural environment could be preserved to a <br />reasonable degree with the proposed injury or interference if applicant provided mitigation," and <br />2) Encourage the Applicant to work with the CWCB staff, the Division Engineer, and the local <br />community to address any outstanding issues before the Applicant brings a final proposal to the <br />Board. <br /> <br />Attachment <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Water Project Planning and Finance. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.