Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MR. CRANDALL: That's the current schedule; and, as 1. explained', we're <br />committed to an intense effort to compress that back so that we II be in <br />a pesition to- move. at the first of the' year and obtain the permissien, <br />to. make the constructien start', and Mr. Sherman has explained, in the <br />appropriatien_process. Again, I'm not discouraged abeut being able to. <br />de that. <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: Let's ask Mr. Meek to finish his questien. <br /> <br />MR. MEEK: Mr. Chairman, in my statement, I made a mistake. I compared <br />us, that we were ready fer constructien with Dallas Creek. I meant that <br />we were ready for censtruction with Bestwick Park, some years ago. <br /> <br />MR. BENTON: I personally have the feeling that we are net getting real <br />definitive answers here today en when some of these things are going ,to <br />happen. Do you think by eur September meeting we'll be able to have <br />some mere definite answers? ' <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. CRANDALL: The drafts ef the envirenmental statement are due fer <br />completion in August, Mr. .Benten, and my present plan and commitment .is <br />to get the reviewers in eur Denver and Washingten offices together to <br />clear it at that time. <br /> <br />MR. BENTON: In ether werds, hy September -- <br /> <br />. <br />MR. CRANDALl,: By September, we':!-l know whether this approach has <br />clicked and we're on our way. <br /> <br />MR. BENTON: De yeu think we might know whether the eriginal contract <br />is going to be all right by our September meeting? <br /> <br />. <br />. . <br />MR. CRANDALL: I'll raise this questien and get an answer at that time. <br />I might also. suggest that in spite ef eur lapse, I think it weuld be <br />very, impertant that we have continuing communication with Mr.~ Sparks. <br />and his staff and Mr. Sherman representing the ether state agencies en <br />just what's happening on a day-te-day basis. <br /> <br />. . <br />On Fruitland Mesa, for example, there has to be a final definition on <br />the mitigatien features for fish and wildlife, and this has not been <br />specified yet. So., we will have to have that in order to complete it, <br />and that's semething that we must get on with in the next week in erder <br />to meet this timetable. I've talked to Mr~ Reed abeut it, but we haven't <br />gotten down to specific acreages, requirements, and that sert of thing. <br />It's geing to take a high level of understanding and ceeperatien on all <br />matters. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. FETCHER: I weuld like a little more clarificatien abeut Savery-Pet <br />Heek. As I understand it, the reformulatien is.basically on the Savery <br />part ef the project, is that cerrect? <br /> <br />, , <br />MR. CRANDALL: As far as the dam, yes, but there have been changes in <br />land areas served. <br /> <br />, . <br />MR. FETCHER: Well, if there were no major changes on the .Pethook side, <br /> <br />-28- <br />