My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01982
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:09:37 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:06:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/30/1976
Description
Agenda or Table of Contents, Minutes, Resolution
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />MR. BROWNELL: Have yeu been delayed by this board? <br /> <br />MR. CRANDALL: No.. We've received enly the finest coeperation and <br />support from this board. That's why I have such a deep feeling ef regret <br />that this lapse en eur part has led to. this cencern. <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: Dave, have other agencies in the state ef,Celerado caused <br />this delay en the Dallas preject? <br /> <br />MR. CRANDALL: There are problems ef meshing the different viewpoints en <br />the seurce cemmitment, and these have been werked out in the state. I <br />think the changes that have caused the delay reflect the diversity ef <br />opinion in the area, peeple in the Dallas Divide area and elsewhere, <br />about the preject impacts. I den't think it's an institutionalized <br />cencern. It's been an expression of public cencern. <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: Then l'd have one ether ~uestien. I think I heard yeu <br />say that en the Delores, a1theugh that s net specific in the reperts <br />today, that perhaps that weuld be meved frem February er March ef 1978 <br />to. perhaps August or September ef 1977. Did I hear that? <br /> <br />MR. CRANDALL: You didn't hear these specific menths, but the fiscal <br />year being what it is, it has to. be that way, yes. <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: I heard you say early '78,. moved back to. late '77. <br />that's en the Deleres and net en this ene. <br /> <br />Now, <br /> <br />MR. STAPLETON: He said March. <br />MR. CRANDALL: Right. <br />MR. KROEGER: Did you say March ef '77 en the Doleres? <br />MR. CRANDALL: No.. <br />MR. KROEGER: I heard yeu say late in fiscal '77. <br /> <br />MR. CRANDALL: If I did, I did net intend it. The date fer the <br />ef censtruction en the De1eres would be very late in the fiscal <br />which would be August, September, something in that time span. <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: That's still moving it up some six er seven menths ef what <br />teday's schedule calls fer? <br /> <br />initiatien <br />year, <br /> <br />MR. CRANDALL: Yes. ' <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />MR. KROEGER: Then the ether questien is, de yeu have the capabilities <br />within these offices to. de this witheut delaying other prejects? What <br />happens to. the Animas-La Plata er the San Miguel er some ef the other <br />prejects theI1? We're not going to meve that up at the expense ef ether <br />projects also? <br /> <br />MR. CRANDALL: I den't feel we are, Mr. Kroeger. The reasen that we're <br /> <br />-23- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.