My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01965
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01965
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:09:26 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:05:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/22/2005
Description
Flood Section - Presentation of the CWCB's Draft Rules and Regulations for Regulatory Floodplains in Colorado
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
238
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Guidelines and Specijicationsjor Flood Hazard Mapping Partners [Apri/2003] <br /> <br />Table A-I. Comparison of Horizontal Accuracy Standards <br /> <br />NMAS NMAS NSSDA NSSDA ASPRS ] 990 <br />Map Scale CMAS AccuracYr RMSE, Class 11213 <br /> 90% confidence level 95% confidence level Limiting RMSE, <br />1"=500- 16.7 feet 19.0 feet 1 1.0 feet 7.1 feet (Class I) <br /> 14.1 feet (Class 2) <br /> 21.2 feet (Class 3) <br />1"= 1,000' 33.3 feet 38.0 feet 22.0 feet 14.1 feet (Class I) <br /> 28.3 feet (Class 2) <br /> 42.4 reet (Class 3) <br />]" = 2.000' 40.0 feet 45.6 feet 26.3 feet 28.3 feet (Class I) <br /> 56.5 feet (Class 2) <br /> 84.9 feet (Class 3) <br /> <br />Thus, when FEMA specifies a base map at I" = 500', for example, this is the same as FEMA <br />specifying that a digital base map should have a horizontal (radial) RMSE,. of II feet or Accuracy, <br />of 19 feet at the 95-percent confidence level, for consistency with the new NSSDA. <br /> <br />When a base map is compiled at 1"=1,000' and is published at a hardcopy map scale of 1"=500', <br />the horizontal accuracy remains that of the 1"=1,000' map scale. Therefore, such a 1"=500' map <br />would be compiled to meet 38-foot horizontal accuracy at 95-percent confidence level, rather than <br />19-foot horizontal accuracy at 95-percent confidence level as is normally expected of maps <br />published at a scale of 1"=500'. This is an example where "zooming in" on a map image does not <br />make the map any more accurate. <br /> <br />A.3.2 <br /> <br />Vertical Accuracy Criteria <br /> <br />[February 2002J <br /> <br />Several standards for computing vertical accuracy also are in use by the mapping industry. These <br />are discussed and compared below. <br /> <br />The NMAS (Bureau of the Budget, 1947) states: <br /> <br />Vertical accuracy, as applied to contour maps on all publication scales, shall be such <br />that not more than 10 percent of the elevations tested shall be in error more than <br />one-half the contour interval. In checking elevations taken from the map, the <br />apparent vertical error may be decreased by assuming a horizontal displacement <br />within the permissible horizontal error for a map of that scale. <br /> <br />This one-half contour interval under NMAS is called the Vertical Map Accuracy Standard <br />(YMAS). NMAS became obsolete for digital mapping products because computers can easily <br />change the scale and contour interval of a map, and maps are not more accurate because the <br /> <br />A-7 <br /> <br />Section A.3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.