Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1'\ 'a <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br /> <br />. Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 721 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3441 <br />FAX: (303) 866-4474 <br />WWW".cwcb.state.co.us <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board Members <br /> <br />Russell George <br />Executive Director <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Randy SeallOIm, Chief, Water Supply Protection~ <br /> <br />Rod Kuharich <br />CWCB Director <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />March 10, 2005 <br /> <br />Dan McAuliffe <br />_ Deputy Director <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Agenda Item 31, March 22-23,2005 Board Meeting <br />Water Supply Protection, Navajo Nation Federal Reserved Water Right <br />Settlement with the State of New Mexico <br /> <br />Backl!round <br /> <br />Attached hereto is the most recent draft of the Executive Summary (ES) of the "San Juan River <br />Basin in New Mexico, Navajo Nation Water Rights Settlement" dated December 10, 2004. Rather <br />than attempt to summarize the proposed settlement agreernent with its extensive qualifications, I <br />have elected to let the summary speak for itself. The Board discussed an earlier draft of the <br />proposed settlement at its January 2004 meeting and provided New Mexico with Comments on <br />February 12, 2004. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />The Navajo Nation approved the December 10, 2004 draft settlement agreement on December 29, <br />2004 by a vote of 62 to 18. The New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission unanimously approved <br />the same on January 12,2005. Subsequently, the New Mexico House on February 23,2005 <br />approved "Joint Memorial 53" expressing appreciation to all involved for reaching a potential <br />settlement of the Navajo Nation's water rights by a vote of63 to O. The settlement agreement has <br />you can see has a considerable amount of momentum, although it still must be accepted by the State <br />Attorney General and signed by the Governor and the Navajo Nation before being presented to the <br />New Mexico congressional delegation for introduction into the U.S. Congress for enactment. <br /> <br />As noted, Colorado provided comments to New Mexico on February 12, 2004. Colorado's <br />comments were addressed as follows: <br /> <br />1. Does the settlement actually keep New Mexico within its compact apportionment under the <br /> <br />current "Hydrologic Determination"? The settlement agreements appear to accomplish this. <br /> <br />However, New Mexico is advancing a depletion schedule that assumes that 5% of the Irrigated <br /> <br />land is fallow at any given point in time. If this does not occur, New Mexico would rely on <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Flood ProteGtion. Water Supply Planning and Finance. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply !jotection. Conservation and Drought Planning <br />