My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01959
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01959
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:09:15 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:05:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/11/1998
Description
WSP Section - Colorado River Basin Issues - Aspinall Operations - 1998 Planned Spring Peak
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'. <br /> <br />November 22, 1994 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Board is of the opinion that operations at Aspinall, to date, have provided adequate <br />releases to offset the depletions and satIsfy commitments associated with the biological <br />opinions for the Dallas and Dolores projects. . <br /> <br />2) Blue M~sa should be filled by the end of July each year. <br /> <br />3) Storage in Blue Mesa should be reduced to 581,000 AF oflive storage by December 31 each <br />year to help alleviate the potential for ice jam flooding between December 1 and April 30 <br />above Blue Mesa Reservoir. Furthermore, this drawdown and subsequent additional <br />drawdown which may occur based on runoff forecasts provides the reservoir space required <br />to regulate spring runoff and minimize downstream flooding. Winter carry over storage <br />should not be increased simply to provide a spring peak. <br /> <br />4) <br /> <br />The bypass or spill of water should be avoided to the extent possible at all three reservoirs. <br />This is required by the Colorado River Storage Project Act which authorized the construction <br />of the Aspinall Unit. High flows should not be forced to bypass the powerplants or cause <br />flooding in the Delta area if such is avoidable. To the extent forecast and runoff conditions <br />allow, peak spring releases from the Aspinall Unit should be timed to coincide with peak <br />flows on the North Fork and Uncompahgre, but the peak at Whitewater should be no more <br />than 20,000 cfs in order to minimize the potential for downstream flooding and flood damage.. <br /> <br />5) Release rates should not be such that reservoir levels drop below minimum power head except <br />during extreme drought. <br /> <br />f <br />I <br />, <br />-~ <br /> <br />6) Power generation should be the next consideration. Ramping rates should be as large as <br />possible and seasonally adjusted after taking into consideration the needs of the gold medal <br />trout fishery, endangered fish and other relevant recreation and project'safety concerns. We <br />generally concur with the recommended ramping rates suggested by the Colorado Division of <br />Wildlife which are to ramp up at 500 cfslday, ramp down at 250 cfslday and try to limit daily <br />fluctuations to around 200 cfs, particularly during fish spawning and hatch times. <br /> <br />7) To the extent possible, Reclamation should work with Western to reduce fluctuation <br />restrictions on Morrow Point and Crystal, We are of the opinion that there must be some way <br />to adjust tour boat operations on Morrow Point to provide Western with some additional <br />operational flexibility. Release restrictions on power operations in 1994 resulted in lost <br />revenues for Western of $3.5 million at Glen Canyon, $1.5 million at the Gorge and $1.5 <br />million at Aspinall, for a total of $6.5 million in lost revenues during 1994. <br /> <br />8) If possible, after satisfying the above, the Black Canyon flows should be kept at 800-1200 cfs <br />to satisfy rafters between April 15 and October 30. <br /> <br />.,"1 . <br /><~J ~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.