Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />non-Indian water users. That is the problem we have. In addition <br />to those three streams that I have mentioned, we have also the <br />Animas River, the Piedra River, the San Juan River, and several other <br />small tributaries which all run through either the Southern Ute <br />Indian reservation or the Ute Mountain ute Indian reservation and <br />from which the Indians are certainly going to be entitled to some <br />water rights under the doctrine set forth in Winters vs. the United <br />States and the Arizona vs. California cases in the United States <br />Supreme Court. <br /> <br />The Animas-La Plata project will provide extensive benefits in terms <br />of water to both the Southern Ute and the Ute Mountain Ute Indian <br />tribes. As originally authorized, before the Indian water right <br />problem became a reality, the project would provide for a total of <br />80,000 acre-feet for development of the Indian resources. The <br />Southern Utes and the Ute Mountain Utes both have extensive coal <br />resources in the general area of the Four Corners which they can use <br />either for electricity, for coal gasification or coal liquefication. <br />It represents one of the real economic opportunities that these two <br />tribes have today to continue with tribal developments and self <br />dependence. When the lawsuit became a reality, the Bureau of Recla- <br />mation immediately began studying additional Indian participation <br />and development in both of these projects to the end that we would <br />be able to maximize the Indian participation in the Animas-La Plata <br />project. It represents a practical solution to a problem that is of <br />concern not only to the people of the San Juan basin, but certainly <br />to the people of the state of Colorado as evidenced by the fact that <br />this board as recently as two months ago adopted a resolution <br />requesting an additional money appropriation to represent the water <br />users of the state in not only this litigation, but also the litiga- <br />tion in water divisions 4, 5 and 6 of the state of Colorado on the <br />other federal water claims. <br /> <br />At this time in order to give you a view of both the non-Indian water <br />user who faces a real tragedy and also a viewpoint from an Indian <br />leader in southwestern Colorado, I would like to introduce to the <br />board at this time Mr. Noland Alexander, the president of the Mancos <br />Water conservancy District, to have him tell you a little bit about <br />the Mancos water reclamation project and what the possibility of <br />this lawsuit does to the area of Mancos, Colorado. Noland. <br /> <br />Mr. Alexander: I am Noland Alexander, the president of the Mancos <br />Water Conservancy District. The project was authorized in 1948, the <br />Jackson Gulch project, and at that time the water users made a <br /> <br />-10- <br />