My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01926
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:08:52 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:04:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/27/2004
Description
ISF Section - Instream Flow Appropriations - West Antelope Creek
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />c' <br /> <br />: :' .~(:-) <br /> <br />c' <br /> <br />() <br /> <br />Beaver dams in this section of stream are breached. <br />Beaver ponds shown in the 1977 aerial photos are no longer present, so the dams may <br />have been breached in the last 23 years. <br />. The active channel is not in the lowest part of the valley (see cross-section II). <br />Bankfull surfaces are poorly defined or absent <br />Flow in the channel was very low, and the channel could potentially run dry, <br />Slope is variable along the longitudinal profile and there are some steeper sections <br />with small waterfalls, - <br /> <br />The critical observation is that the channel does not flow in the lowest part of the valley <br />cross section. It is likely that the channel will abruptly shift its position to the low point <br />during a future high-flow event, possibly next year. One might anticipate that the shift in <br />channel position would not be complete and the channel could split into two separate <br />channels, with some flow in each channel. The summer discharge is quite low (as <br />measured in this project) and splitting the flow could result in extremely low flow and the <br />real possibility that the channel might become dry. This would obviously threaten the <br />population of Colorado River cutthroat trout <br /> <br />Recommendations <br /> <br />We recommend that this system be monitored for changes in channel position and <br />resulting changes in channel hydrology (width, depth, discharge, etc.), It is possible that <br />the cutthroat trout may have used the beaver ponds as a refuge during low-flow periods, <br />We further recommend that beaver be reintroduced and that the beaver dams be restored <br />in this section of West Antelope Creek to provide this refuge for cutthroat trout <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.