My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01925
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01925
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:08:49 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:04:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/21/2001
Description
WSP Section - Platte River Endangered Species Cooperative Agreement
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Another key issue that has not been resolved is how pulse and peak flow requirements may <br />effect future water development. <br /> <br />. The Land Committee did not meet. <br /> <br />. The Technical Committee (TC) met and completed a number oftasks. The Whooping <br />Crane monitoring effort was completed (March 10-April 30). A total of 4 confirmed, and 8 <br />possible Whooping Cranes sightings were reported in the study area. A summary of their <br />activity and habitat use will be prepared. A Tern and Plover monitoring plan will begin in <br />late May. Black and white air photos were taken on April 16. These photos will be used to <br />monitor river channel changes over time and will be repeated every other year. The <br />Technical Committee is also recommending that Color Infra Red photos be taken every other <br />year to monitor vegetation changes over time. The Finance Committee gave approval to take <br />one set of CIR photos. <br /> <br />The Technical Committee held a workshop with the Governance Committee on April 20. <br />The outcome of the workshop was very encouraging in regard to the channel <br />morphology/sediment issues that have been raised by the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service). <br />Weare cautiously optimistic that this issue may get "rolled" into monitoring and research <br />and adaptive management. This is very significant because prior to this meeting the Service <br />seemed to be insisting that the program could not go forward until a third program element <br />was added (sediment). The Service also appeared to want specific sediment activities <br />included in the program to offset jeopardy. We are hopeful that a more flexible incremental <br />approach to this issue will be developed in the next month or two, but many challenges must <br />be resolved. <br /> <br />The three states hired Parsons Engineering to help us evaluate the channel morphology issues <br />(sediment) raised by the EIS team, and Fish and Wildlife Service. Given the progress we <br />have made on this issue, as described above, we are now faced with the challenge of how to <br />proceed with the study without reinitiating antagonism and conflict. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.