My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01917
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01917
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:08:43 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:04:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/16/2004
Description
Report of the Attorney General
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />J <br /> <br /> <br />KEN SALAZAR <br />Attorney General <br />DONALD S. QUICK <br />Chief Deputy Attorney General <br />ALAN J. GILBERT <br />Solicitor General. <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DEPARTMENT OF LAW <br /> <br />STATE SERVICES BIJIl.DlNG <br />1525 Sherman Street - 5th Floor <br />Denver~ Colorado 80203 <br />Phone 303) 866-4500 <br />FAX 303) 866-5691 <br /> <br />OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL <br /> <br />March 9, 2004 <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Ken Salazar <br />Attorney General <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Carol Angel <br />First Assistant Attorney General <br /> <br />Felicity Hannay <br />Senior Counsel <br /> <br />RE: Report of the Attorney General! <br /> <br />1. Forest Service Reserved Rie:bts Cases, Case Nos. W-1146-73 et aI., Water Division 7. <br /> <br />The Forest Service has still not replied to the state and water users June, 2003 joint response <br />to the Forest Service's settlement proposal. Our response set forth some general principles to <br />guide future negotiations that we would require in order to continue on a settlement path. <br /> <br />2. Kansas v. Colorado, United States Supreme Court. No. 105, Orie:inaI. <br /> <br />Kansas filed exceptions to the Special Master's Fourth Report with the U.S. Supreme Court <br />January 22. The United States requested and was granted an extension of the time for reply so <br />they could file a response supporting the Special Master's recommendation that no river master <br />should be appointed; this is helpful to Colorado's position. Colorado's and the United States' <br />responses are due March 22. We now know that there will be no oral argument set in this case <br /> <br />". <br /> <br />1 Text concerning previously reported matters will usually contain only information on recent developments rather <br />than repeating background information. Material to which we wish to call special attention appears in bold italics, <br />and any entirely new matters are specifically identified as (NEWI. <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.